http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/11/02/poverty-in-america-is-mainstream/
Summary: This article is about poverty in the United States. It explains a lot of the misconceptions about overtly and the truth about what's going on. For example a high percentage of the population is in poverty and that it is very difficult to get out of. The welfare programs we have aren't as helpful as we want them to be. It's hard to have an effective program when you have to make cuts and changes to it constantly. This article is a blog so it does have some bias to it. However it does have some factual information in it.
Reaction: I think it's sad that so many people are in poverty. It's difficult to help them because money has to be spent on so many things. It is hard for people in poverty to get out of it and there isn't really any action being done to try and make it better. Every time someone tries to me legislation to make things better for those in poverty it gets struck down and never gets passed.
Connection: this connects to the gridlock that we have in congress. No steps can be taken towards fixing the problem because the two parties can't agree on anything.
Wednesday, February 26, 2014
Tuesday, February 25, 2014
"Obama’s Puzzle: Economy Rarely Better, Approval Rarely Worse" - Haidyn Hank - Economics #2
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/28/us/politics/obamas-puzzle-economy-rarely-better-approval-rarely-worse.html?action=click&module=Search®ion=searchResults%230&version=&url=http%3A%2F%2Fquery.nytimes.com%2Fsearch%2Fsitesearch%2F%23%2Feconomy%2F30days%2F
Summary:
When President Obama gave his State of the Union address in January, the economy had never been better during his time in the White House; however, at the same time, the complaints and criticisms had never been so frequent and so brutal. Some economists have even gone so far as to call 2014 a "comeback" year. According to the New York Times, "Demand for labor is up and the unemployment rate is below 7 percent for the first time since November 2008." Consumers and businesses alike are spending more money and exports have been growing once again. Obama's good ratings have continued to plummet, as the negative ratings continue to skyrocket. Despite the economy being in the best shape its been in for quite some time, people still don't seem pleased with the work the president has done so far throughout his career. One of the reasons this could be occurring is because, although the president has done a lot, many people aren't seeing direct effects. People don't like the fact that, despite the talk of it, they aren't seeing any changes in their lives and their lifestyles. They aren't seeing the changes they want to see or the changes they think that they deserve.
Reaction:
I think that more Americans should be happy with the economy and stop criticizing Obama so much for it because he came into this when he was first elected president and has been working to fix it since he walked into the White House. I know we've had this crappy economy for a long time already, but I think that if people could be a little more patient, they would see the results that they want to see. If they would give more time for an effect to happen, they would see a direct effect and see how President Obama's works has boosted the economy and he is gradually fixing it to the best of his ability.
Connection:
This situation can be connected to when I did a little bit of research on some issues Terry Branstad has been having for class. I learned that Branstad is being criticized for not having enough african american people on his staff. This isn't really his fault though because he suggested an african american person to be a member of his staff, but they were turned down by other people. This connects because Obama is doing the work that needs to be done and working hard to make the economy better, and despite the fact that it has been getting better, he is getting frequent criticisms on how he's doing his job, mostly by people who couldn't do it any better. The connection is that Branstad and Obama are both trying to do something to fix the criticisms, but nothing is really working and they are still being criticized when they are actually trying to make things better.
Summary:
When President Obama gave his State of the Union address in January, the economy had never been better during his time in the White House; however, at the same time, the complaints and criticisms had never been so frequent and so brutal. Some economists have even gone so far as to call 2014 a "comeback" year. According to the New York Times, "Demand for labor is up and the unemployment rate is below 7 percent for the first time since November 2008." Consumers and businesses alike are spending more money and exports have been growing once again. Obama's good ratings have continued to plummet, as the negative ratings continue to skyrocket. Despite the economy being in the best shape its been in for quite some time, people still don't seem pleased with the work the president has done so far throughout his career. One of the reasons this could be occurring is because, although the president has done a lot, many people aren't seeing direct effects. People don't like the fact that, despite the talk of it, they aren't seeing any changes in their lives and their lifestyles. They aren't seeing the changes they want to see or the changes they think that they deserve.
Reaction:
I think that more Americans should be happy with the economy and stop criticizing Obama so much for it because he came into this when he was first elected president and has been working to fix it since he walked into the White House. I know we've had this crappy economy for a long time already, but I think that if people could be a little more patient, they would see the results that they want to see. If they would give more time for an effect to happen, they would see a direct effect and see how President Obama's works has boosted the economy and he is gradually fixing it to the best of his ability.
Connection:
This situation can be connected to when I did a little bit of research on some issues Terry Branstad has been having for class. I learned that Branstad is being criticized for not having enough african american people on his staff. This isn't really his fault though because he suggested an african american person to be a member of his staff, but they were turned down by other people. This connects because Obama is doing the work that needs to be done and working hard to make the economy better, and despite the fact that it has been getting better, he is getting frequent criticisms on how he's doing his job, mostly by people who couldn't do it any better. The connection is that Branstad and Obama are both trying to do something to fix the criticisms, but nothing is really working and they are still being criticized when they are actually trying to make things better.
Social Welfare - Olivia Solbrig
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/17/business/a-fine-line-between-social-welfare-and-politics.html
A Fine Line Between Social and Political
Sydney Wientjes; Healthcare/Environment: "Child dies from infected rat; family sues Petco"
Summary: A ten year old boy from San Diego passed away last June due to a disease he contracted from his pet rat purchased at Petco. A lawsuit was just filed by the Pankey family against the chain for an unspecified amount. It was proven by a medical examiner that the disease was, in fact, caused by a disease commonly called "rat-bite fever." The illness set in and proved fatal in less than a day for young Aidan. The lawsuit was put on hold because the attorneys were awaiting lab results to confirm that the disease came directly from the rodent. Though Petco gave its condolences to the family, they are going through with the lawsuit to ensure that this doesn't happen again. However, Petco is determined to defend itself with the fact that they do place warnings on their website that all rats, no matter how harmless they appear, may be carriers.
Reaction: This incident surprised me because of how rare and violent the circumstances seemed to be. The article stated that this has only been recorded in approximately 200 people (Center for Food Security and Public Health at Iowa State University), and only a handful had ever been fatal. In my opinion, the family should receive at least some money for their trauma. In addition, I believe that Petco (and all other registered pet stores that sell rodents) should be required to administer tests to separate the infected rats from the safe ones in order to not risk the chance of this happening again and bringing an even larger, more intensive lawsuit against the company.
Connection: This article can be connected to the numerous litigant epitaphs we have covered throughout the course. I believe that this lawsuit has the potential to leave a mark on all pet stores and has the power to have laws enacted on the federal level to closer regulate pet stores.
Sarah Flynn Adoption: Child Welfare or Business?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/frank-ligtvoet/adoption-child-welfare-or-business_b_4804779.html
Summary: Providing social services for the first family to overcome their problems is all about adding time to the equation. Not an adoption plan, but a life plan has to be made. Adoption should only become an option when family preservation is just impossible or when the efforts to keep the family together failed. Adoption should not be separate of child welfare services, but part of them. Parents should stay with their kids and the gov. should help.
Reaction: I think this is too and bad I think that if you don't thinknyoubarevthe best option for your child then you should be able to freely let them go but if you want to take care of them and just don't have the money to then then gov. should help you.
Connection: this is like welfare checks and how you should have to show your doing something in order to receive them.
Summary: Providing social services for the first family to overcome their problems is all about adding time to the equation. Not an adoption plan, but a life plan has to be made. Adoption should only become an option when family preservation is just impossible or when the efforts to keep the family together failed. Adoption should not be separate of child welfare services, but part of them. Parents should stay with their kids and the gov. should help.
Reaction: I think this is too and bad I think that if you don't thinknyoubarevthe best option for your child then you should be able to freely let them go but if you want to take care of them and just don't have the money to then then gov. should help you.
Connection: this is like welfare checks and how you should have to show your doing something in order to receive them.
IRS Sets Its Sights on Political 'Dark Money'- Social Welfare- Brianna Klabunde
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/the-center-for-public-integrity/irs-sets-its-sights-on-po_b_4351355.html
Summary: A new form of "dark money" is being used to donate to parties. As long as nonprofit groups such as Americans for Prosperity are strictly meant to aid social welfare and or the common good these groups are allowed to donate money without a name. The concern is that there is are not strict guidelines on what "governmental spending" is.
Reaction: I think people are just trying to find anyway they can to cheat the system. Not having a donors name listed can lead to corruption through special treatment. Not to mention, the lack of strict rules about "government spending" is concerning. When it comes to donating money to parties, the whole business seems to be full of loopholes.
Connection: This links directly back to our unit on PACs and soft money. Rules set up by the FEC are constantly being bent. Un-traced money can lead to corruption. These problems are just getting worse and something should be done to make the guidelines more clear.
Summary: A new form of "dark money" is being used to donate to parties. As long as nonprofit groups such as Americans for Prosperity are strictly meant to aid social welfare and or the common good these groups are allowed to donate money without a name. The concern is that there is are not strict guidelines on what "governmental spending" is.
Reaction: I think people are just trying to find anyway they can to cheat the system. Not having a donors name listed can lead to corruption through special treatment. Not to mention, the lack of strict rules about "government spending" is concerning. When it comes to donating money to parties, the whole business seems to be full of loopholes.
Connection: This links directly back to our unit on PACs and soft money. Rules set up by the FEC are constantly being bent. Un-traced money can lead to corruption. These problems are just getting worse and something should be done to make the guidelines more clear.
Kylee Cangas - Privacy Please: Tools to Shield Your Smartphone
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/20/technology/personaltech/privacy-please-tools-to-shield-your-smartphone-from-snoopers.html?hpw&rref=technology&action=click&module=Search®ion=searchResults%230&version=&url=http%3A%2F%2Fquery.nytimes.com%2Fsearch%2Fsitesearch%2F%3Faction%3Dclick%26region%3DMasthead%26pgtype%3DSectionFront%26module%3DSearchSubmit%26contentCollection%3Dus%26t%3Dqry831%23%2Fnational%2Bsecurity%2F7days%2F&_r=0
Summary- The article goes into detail about the recent National Security scandals and how to keep your smart phone safe. It relates it to the recent issues of the government tapping into our privacy to get information. The article gives several apps and points of advice for how to shield and encrypt ones messages, calls, and browsing information. It gives people options who are worried about their privacy. There are several companies coming out with apps and even a new smart phone that will better protect someone's information.
Reaction- I think these are good things to know, however I do not think this is a huge problem. Also many of the Apps require both communicators to have them and be operating within them so it seems rather inconvenient. Keeping people's privacy is important, but at some point if you are going through all of the trouble to stay private then it brings up the question, what for? There was some controversy with government security recently and it is reasonable that people are concerned about it however I do not think that the government would intrude on the people's privacy for no reason at all, and those who go through all of the trouble must have something to hide.
Connection- This connects to the lack of trust in the government that we have been seeing. If people believe the government is infringing on their privacy it will contribute to a lack of trust and belief in the government, which we have already seen. It also connects to the constitution in terms of search and seizure rights and whether the government, in a national security issue, has the right to intrude on people's privacy if they believe they are protecting them.
Summary- The article goes into detail about the recent National Security scandals and how to keep your smart phone safe. It relates it to the recent issues of the government tapping into our privacy to get information. The article gives several apps and points of advice for how to shield and encrypt ones messages, calls, and browsing information. It gives people options who are worried about their privacy. There are several companies coming out with apps and even a new smart phone that will better protect someone's information.
Reaction- I think these are good things to know, however I do not think this is a huge problem. Also many of the Apps require both communicators to have them and be operating within them so it seems rather inconvenient. Keeping people's privacy is important, but at some point if you are going through all of the trouble to stay private then it brings up the question, what for? There was some controversy with government security recently and it is reasonable that people are concerned about it however I do not think that the government would intrude on the people's privacy for no reason at all, and those who go through all of the trouble must have something to hide.
Connection- This connects to the lack of trust in the government that we have been seeing. If people believe the government is infringing on their privacy it will contribute to a lack of trust and belief in the government, which we have already seen. It also connects to the constitution in terms of search and seizure rights and whether the government, in a national security issue, has the right to intrude on people's privacy if they believe they are protecting them.
Henry Crowley National Security U.S., allies agree...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/us-allies-agree-on-standards-for-which-opposition-groups-in-syria-will-receive-aid/2014/02/20/7b5b8b02-9a53-11e3-b931-0204122c514b_story.html
Summary: Syria's ongoing civil war has taken 140,000 lives and has sent millions of others, poor and starving, in pursuit of safer countries for residency. America and its allies attempt to decide how to differentiate who the bad guys are in the battle torn nation. Shipments of weapons, training, intelligence, and other support also have increased. As the council of world governments bicker and debate on who to side with, Arab and European officials have taken notice that the U.S. is taking a more aggressive stance on the issue, while persuading others to do the same. Some dismiss the point of view as justified due to rifts appearing between rebel ranks, distinguishing friend from foe.
Reaction: The Middle East is a mess. There is no doubt that foreign assistance can help heal the country. But, in the time it takes for Superpowers to decide who to help, hundreds perish in the name of war and religion. Distinguishing the enemies from the allies is essential, but we waste time and skills talking when we should be acting. It's not my place to say this, because I don't have the experience or the knowledge, but perhaps it is clear on the organizations we should help to those that decide how and when to help.
Connection: The article reminds me of the class time discussing the president's role as Commander-in-Chief. The leader of the nation has a say in foreign conflicts and works strategically with other commanders. The weapons and training going towards Syria are part of a decision made by the president and other military advisers.
Summary: Syria's ongoing civil war has taken 140,000 lives and has sent millions of others, poor and starving, in pursuit of safer countries for residency. America and its allies attempt to decide how to differentiate who the bad guys are in the battle torn nation. Shipments of weapons, training, intelligence, and other support also have increased. As the council of world governments bicker and debate on who to side with, Arab and European officials have taken notice that the U.S. is taking a more aggressive stance on the issue, while persuading others to do the same. Some dismiss the point of view as justified due to rifts appearing between rebel ranks, distinguishing friend from foe.
Reaction: The Middle East is a mess. There is no doubt that foreign assistance can help heal the country. But, in the time it takes for Superpowers to decide who to help, hundreds perish in the name of war and religion. Distinguishing the enemies from the allies is essential, but we waste time and skills talking when we should be acting. It's not my place to say this, because I don't have the experience or the knowledge, but perhaps it is clear on the organizations we should help to those that decide how and when to help.
Connection: The article reminds me of the class time discussing the president's role as Commander-in-Chief. The leader of the nation has a say in foreign conflicts and works strategically with other commanders. The weapons and training going towards Syria are part of a decision made by the president and other military advisers.
Blake Bodenschatz nuclear plant break-in
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/02/18/nun-nuke-protest-sentencing/5577947/
Summary: A group of three were able to break into the Y-12 national security complex. They got in and only defaced property but the government is wondering what would have happened if they got their hands on the weapons-grade uranium. The three were sentenced to anywhere between 26-35 months. The group has many supporters stating that they did the right thing defacing the plant because they are slowly making the country a safer place. Many people are questioning if they should be punished like this because they are not terrorists or spies.
Reaction: I believe that these three should still be punished because they got into a nuclear factory and vandalized it but what would have happen if they decided to take it a step further and use the factory to their own gain. This makes me question if these three people can get into a nuclear factory so easy what would happen if a terrorist or someone along the same lines got into the factory and used the weapons-grade uranium against the country.
Connection: This case brought up the Espionage act of 1917 that make sure that any sabotage on federal ground is deemed as illegal and punished. This connects because the three people sabotaged a nuclear factory of the government and it must be punished because of this act.
Summary: A group of three were able to break into the Y-12 national security complex. They got in and only defaced property but the government is wondering what would have happened if they got their hands on the weapons-grade uranium. The three were sentenced to anywhere between 26-35 months. The group has many supporters stating that they did the right thing defacing the plant because they are slowly making the country a safer place. Many people are questioning if they should be punished like this because they are not terrorists or spies.
Reaction: I believe that these three should still be punished because they got into a nuclear factory and vandalized it but what would have happen if they decided to take it a step further and use the factory to their own gain. This makes me question if these three people can get into a nuclear factory so easy what would happen if a terrorist or someone along the same lines got into the factory and used the weapons-grade uranium against the country.
Connection: This case brought up the Espionage act of 1917 that make sure that any sabotage on federal ground is deemed as illegal and punished. This connects because the three people sabotaged a nuclear factory of the government and it must be punished because of this act.
Jason Erbst- Economics- "The U.S. Economy Might Be Doomed—but the Stock Market Isn't"
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/02/the-us-economy-might-be-doomed-but-the-stock-market-isnt/283905/
Summary- there is a radical economist who throws all these irrational things out there but some things he has said has pertained to be true. This one thing being talked about is how many may think if the GDP is tanking, so is the economy. Especially out of the recession, this has been easily shown as false. The stock market is independent to each company and it's values.
Reaction- I followed the bait thinking that as GDP decreases so does the market, but I was surprised to find out this is false. I am interested to see how this trend will continue as the years go on and possibly as we ourselves get out of this debt.
Connection- I see a connection between this and the president in how he is always blamed for things that happen in our country. As well does how the economy is doing with the stock market. But as this article shows, the market is not always directly connected with the economy's performance much like how the president isn't always to blame.
Summary- there is a radical economist who throws all these irrational things out there but some things he has said has pertained to be true. This one thing being talked about is how many may think if the GDP is tanking, so is the economy. Especially out of the recession, this has been easily shown as false. The stock market is independent to each company and it's values.
Reaction- I followed the bait thinking that as GDP decreases so does the market, but I was surprised to find out this is false. I am interested to see how this trend will continue as the years go on and possibly as we ourselves get out of this debt.
Connection- I see a connection between this and the president in how he is always blamed for things that happen in our country. As well does how the economy is doing with the stock market. But as this article shows, the market is not always directly connected with the economy's performance much like how the president isn't always to blame.
Emma Walraven- Healthcare and Environment- Oil and gas drilling pollutes well water, states confirm
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2014/01/05/22190011-oil-and-gas-drilling-pollutes-well-water-states-confirm?lite
Summary: Over the past two years, there have been complaints in Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia, and Texas about oil drilling polluting private water wells. These complaints have been increasing more and more over the past year or so. Even more so, these are states that have "nurtured the nation's energy boom". Over the past 10 years, hydraulic fracturing has led to a boom in oil and natural gas production around the nation. It has decreased our need for imports and led to billions of dollars of income for companies and landowners. On the down side, it has increased pollution fears. The most common type of pollution is said to be methane, not chemicals from the drilling process. Investigating these complaints could be difficult because some regions have naturally high methane gas pollution and other problems unrelated to drilling. On the other hand, people trying to understand the pros and cons of the drilling boom need alot of details from complaints, even if they might be natural causes.
Reaction: This topic, for me, is complicated because I have mixed feelings about it. On one hand, I do think it's good we have increased in oil and decreased in the need to borrow it from other countries (especially those we are not even allies with). I also, however, believe pollution is an important issue and should be handled immediatley. I'm not a doctor and not even close to an expert, but i'm assuming that oil polluting water has to be a big health hazard. I think all complaints should be investigated, even those that may include natural causes because you never know where they could lead to.
Connection: This article reminds me of committees in Congress. There are certain committees in Congress that deal with environmental issues and if someone were to come up with a solution to the issue this article discusses, the bill would be sent to that specific committee.
Summary: Over the past two years, there have been complaints in Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia, and Texas about oil drilling polluting private water wells. These complaints have been increasing more and more over the past year or so. Even more so, these are states that have "nurtured the nation's energy boom". Over the past 10 years, hydraulic fracturing has led to a boom in oil and natural gas production around the nation. It has decreased our need for imports and led to billions of dollars of income for companies and landowners. On the down side, it has increased pollution fears. The most common type of pollution is said to be methane, not chemicals from the drilling process. Investigating these complaints could be difficult because some regions have naturally high methane gas pollution and other problems unrelated to drilling. On the other hand, people trying to understand the pros and cons of the drilling boom need alot of details from complaints, even if they might be natural causes.
Reaction: This topic, for me, is complicated because I have mixed feelings about it. On one hand, I do think it's good we have increased in oil and decreased in the need to borrow it from other countries (especially those we are not even allies with). I also, however, believe pollution is an important issue and should be handled immediatley. I'm not a doctor and not even close to an expert, but i'm assuming that oil polluting water has to be a big health hazard. I think all complaints should be investigated, even those that may include natural causes because you never know where they could lead to.
Connection: This article reminds me of committees in Congress. There are certain committees in Congress that deal with environmental issues and if someone were to come up with a solution to the issue this article discusses, the bill would be sent to that specific committee.
David Niska Economic Policymaking- Wal-Mart and the World Economy
Summary: Wal-Mart is a key company for the world economy. Wal-Mart's goods used to be made in the United States but not anymore. Wal-Mart has looked for cheaper ways to have their goods made and in the process, they have turned to Chinese companies. These Chinese companies produce these goods at a lower cost than the same item being made in the U.S., but in the end when U.S. factories move overseas, the jobs do as well as they would have in the U.S.. What the U.S. is worrying about is offshoring, because "global capitalism could have a new face, Wal-Mart. That would be bad news"(Business Week). Many people believe that Wal-Mart has had as big of an influence in the American economy as Henry Ford did when he made the assembly line.
Reaction: I think that it's scary that a store like Wal-Mart could be the face of the global economy and that it would be representing America. America should have a better spokes person than a company like Wal-Mart that gets most of it's goods from China. I think that there should be some limit on how much companies can offshore.
Connection: My connection is back to pluralist theory: a theory of government and politics emphasizing that politics is mainly a competition among groups, each one pressing for its own preferred policies. Wal-Mart is making a pretty good name for itself in the world
Reaction: I think that it's scary that a store like Wal-Mart could be the face of the global economy and that it would be representing America. America should have a better spokes person than a company like Wal-Mart that gets most of it's goods from China. I think that there should be some limit on how much companies can offshore.
Connection: My connection is back to pluralist theory: a theory of government and politics emphasizing that politics is mainly a competition among groups, each one pressing for its own preferred policies. Wal-Mart is making a pretty good name for itself in the world
Jenn Campbell National Security: NSA Changes
http://www.cagle.com/2014/01/nsa-changes-2/#.Uwx_mRpLsDs.email
Summary:
The cartoon is of Obama, the NSA, and the American people. Obama is holding a mascara wand and asking if he fixed the problem. In the cartoon the eye is still really big in the window. This would imply that the cartoonist believes the NSA is still going to spy on the American people. Overall the cartoon is saying that Obama isn't going to do anything to curb the NSA , he is just going to make it look prettier to the American people.
Reaction:
As you know, I'm usually a big supporter of our current president, but I agree with the cartoonist. I feel that to him our nation's "security" outweighs our privacy when it comes to our nation's leaders. But I believe that it is his job to compromise with the NSA and our right to privacy. On the other band I'd rather have my phone calls monitored and be kept safe than the alternative. Overall, I am just glad I don't have to make these decisions.
Connection:
As a crisis manager, the president has to make "quick judgements on the basis of sketchy information". The president has to do this job by monitoring events almost anywhere, including in our own country to avoid sleeper cell attacks. I understand why the president wouldn't want to curb the NSA's monitoring because it has helped, risk the general population's uncomfortableness to save a few lives.
Summary:
The cartoon is of Obama, the NSA, and the American people. Obama is holding a mascara wand and asking if he fixed the problem. In the cartoon the eye is still really big in the window. This would imply that the cartoonist believes the NSA is still going to spy on the American people. Overall the cartoon is saying that Obama isn't going to do anything to curb the NSA , he is just going to make it look prettier to the American people.
Reaction:
As you know, I'm usually a big supporter of our current president, but I agree with the cartoonist. I feel that to him our nation's "security" outweighs our privacy when it comes to our nation's leaders. But I believe that it is his job to compromise with the NSA and our right to privacy. On the other band I'd rather have my phone calls monitored and be kept safe than the alternative. Overall, I am just glad I don't have to make these decisions.
Connection:
As a crisis manager, the president has to make "quick judgements on the basis of sketchy information". The president has to do this job by monitoring events almost anywhere, including in our own country to avoid sleeper cell attacks. I understand why the president wouldn't want to curb the NSA's monitoring because it has helped, risk the general population's uncomfortableness to save a few lives.
Annclare thachil- healthcare and enviroment "Obama orders new effeciency for big trucks"
Summary:
The article talks about the new policy concerning new fuel standard and big trucks. Obama has ordered big trucks to be more fuel efficient to cut back on greenhouse gases emissions. Researchers are saying that this method will be enable Obama to reach his goal of cutting back pollution by 17 percent by 2020. Obama stated some reasons why this could be positive for the nation. It will improve gas mileage, and as a result of that we will be less dependent on oil imports. Truck and vehicle manufactures disagree with Obama saying that it will increase vehicle prices and decrease the safety standard. Obama also hopes that this policy will help persuade other countries to do the same.
Reaction:
I think that this policy is very good for the enviroment. Climate changes are definetly one of the major problems out there and I am happy that someone does something about it. I also think that Obama will get more supporters because many are worried about global warming. But I'm am not completely for this policy because there could be some dangers associated with them like accidents. Overall, I think that this policy will have a big effect on the future because it might reduce the chances of global warming.
Connection:
The connection to government is that Obama ordering big truck companies to be more fuel effiecent is that it is one of the executive powers of the president. He works as the chief executive to run our government and issue executive orders. And he could do this with or without congress. So it doesn't matter if the congress doesn't support him on this policy. Obama "ordering truck companies" shows how much power a president has. Also, it shows what a big role the president had in a country.
Matt Van Horn-environment- obama orders new efficiency for big trucks
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/19/us/politics/obama-to-request-new-rules-for-cutting-truck-pollution.html
Summary- Obama is moving forward with his efforts to reduce carbon emmissions in the US. Having big rig trucks become more fuel, and carbon efficient would help greatly with limiting the emsions of carbon dioxide in the air. Trucks travel day and night, consuming a huge anount of gasaline. Limiting these emisons is a huge step forward. He is also limitng the emisions of coal pollution from smoke stacks And factories. He wants to reach his goal of reducing emisions by around 20 percent from 2005 to 2020.
Reaction- I like what Obama is trying to do with these executive orders. The environment is an inmportant part of our lives and we need to do everything possible to preserve and protect it. Reducing these emisions is important in changing environmental policy. We need to start out small and fix those problems before moving to a bigger scale with more difficult problems. All in all agree fully with what he is doing and i think he should keep it up.
Connection- in the article it says he used an executive order to do this. I think its great that he did so, by overriding a divided congress and getting to business. This is a prime example of why that policy was implemented. So the president could work on his agenda and not be halted by party biased representatives.
Summary- Obama is moving forward with his efforts to reduce carbon emmissions in the US. Having big rig trucks become more fuel, and carbon efficient would help greatly with limiting the emsions of carbon dioxide in the air. Trucks travel day and night, consuming a huge anount of gasaline. Limiting these emisons is a huge step forward. He is also limitng the emisions of coal pollution from smoke stacks And factories. He wants to reach his goal of reducing emisions by around 20 percent from 2005 to 2020.
Reaction- I like what Obama is trying to do with these executive orders. The environment is an inmportant part of our lives and we need to do everything possible to preserve and protect it. Reducing these emisions is important in changing environmental policy. We need to start out small and fix those problems before moving to a bigger scale with more difficult problems. All in all agree fully with what he is doing and i think he should keep it up.
Connection- in the article it says he used an executive order to do this. I think its great that he did so, by overriding a divided congress and getting to business. This is a prime example of why that policy was implemented. So the president could work on his agenda and not be halted by party biased representatives.
Doyle A Strong National Defense Should Be Our First Priority
http://blog.heritage.org/2014/02/22/defending-effective-defense/
Summary: Recent federal budgets have cut military spending. We will see military levels drop to the lowest they have been since world war II. We will also se a halt in nuclear missile research until 2030. At which point all of our missiles will be over 40 years old. We expect nuclear pacts to protect us when countries have a history of disregarding them.
Reaction: Military spending cuts are detrimental to the US. As Teddy said, "speak softly and carry a big stick." This is the equivalent of handing the stick to our enemies and picking up a nerds rope. We cannot afford to cripple our defense, especially now. Most of all we cant afford to trust russia after the psychosis of these olympics.
Connection: Governments are formed to protect the people who make it up. They always have been and will continue to be. If this key characteristic is lost from ours it will put us on a downward slope. We already lack faith in our government but if that government cannot defend us? That is no government at all.
Summary: Recent federal budgets have cut military spending. We will see military levels drop to the lowest they have been since world war II. We will also se a halt in nuclear missile research until 2030. At which point all of our missiles will be over 40 years old. We expect nuclear pacts to protect us when countries have a history of disregarding them.
Reaction: Military spending cuts are detrimental to the US. As Teddy said, "speak softly and carry a big stick." This is the equivalent of handing the stick to our enemies and picking up a nerds rope. We cannot afford to cripple our defense, especially now. Most of all we cant afford to trust russia after the psychosis of these olympics.
Connection: Governments are formed to protect the people who make it up. They always have been and will continue to be. If this key characteristic is lost from ours it will put us on a downward slope. We already lack faith in our government but if that government cannot defend us? That is no government at all.
Liz Flanagan Economics- US consumer confidence dips slightly in February
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/us-consumer-confidence-dips-slightly-in-february/2014/02/25/36e1d9b4-9e30-11e3-878c-65222df220eb_story.html
Summary- US consumer confidence has fallen this month due to the outlook for business conditions and jobs. The confidence rate has dropped a whole percentage from last month (79 to 78). Consumers do not foresee any considerable momentum being gained in the months ahead. Businesses are mostly concerned with how this will affect consumer spending which is over 70% of economic income. However, views about current conditions have improved for four consecutive months (including this month) are are currently at their highest in over six years. The predictions for the rest of the month and the coming months are pulling the ratings down still.
Reaction- This decrease in ecomic confidence makes sense. It's a slow time of year to begin with and our confidence level in our economy fluctuates all the time. However, I do find in interesting that ratings continue to increase and are the highest they've been in years. It seems backwards that ratings are so high yet our economic confidence is so low.
Connection- This up and down movement of our confidence levels is a lot like the months following the election of a new president. The president will often feel the need to pass legislation that the people will like because they just elected him into office (mandate theory of elections). However, when push comes to shove, we know that the president will do what seems better for the long run regardless of public approval. When this happens approval and confidence of the president will go down, much like the economic confidence goes down when we project declining business conditions in the coming months.
Summary- US consumer confidence has fallen this month due to the outlook for business conditions and jobs. The confidence rate has dropped a whole percentage from last month (79 to 78). Consumers do not foresee any considerable momentum being gained in the months ahead. Businesses are mostly concerned with how this will affect consumer spending which is over 70% of economic income. However, views about current conditions have improved for four consecutive months (including this month) are are currently at their highest in over six years. The predictions for the rest of the month and the coming months are pulling the ratings down still.
Reaction- This decrease in ecomic confidence makes sense. It's a slow time of year to begin with and our confidence level in our economy fluctuates all the time. However, I do find in interesting that ratings continue to increase and are the highest they've been in years. It seems backwards that ratings are so high yet our economic confidence is so low.
Connection- This up and down movement of our confidence levels is a lot like the months following the election of a new president. The president will often feel the need to pass legislation that the people will like because they just elected him into office (mandate theory of elections). However, when push comes to shove, we know that the president will do what seems better for the long run regardless of public approval. When this happens approval and confidence of the president will go down, much like the economic confidence goes down when we project declining business conditions in the coming months.
Carter Brown National Security cyberattacks
Debate on Cyberattacks
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/25/world/middleeast/obama-worried-about-effects-of-waging-cyberwar-in-syria.html?ref=nationalsecurityagency
Summary:
This article talks about Obamas worry to use cyber weapons on Syria and worsen the war there. On one hand they would be a good way to get things done and without the risk of our soldiers. But it could also end up in more problems for America. So he is still thinking about and and not making to much public on if we will use them or not.
Reaction:
I think we should use them. If we can do anything that makes it so less troops have to go over and fight somewhere then I'm all for it. I'd rather spend more money than more lives.
Connection:
We are learning about the cabinet of the president and in this situation he is probably talking to his cabinet and more specifically the secretary of defense. He uses his advisors to help him figure out what he will do in situations exactly like this.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/25/world/middleeast/obama-worried-about-effects-of-waging-cyberwar-in-syria.html?ref=nationalsecurityagency
Summary:
This article talks about Obamas worry to use cyber weapons on Syria and worsen the war there. On one hand they would be a good way to get things done and without the risk of our soldiers. But it could also end up in more problems for America. So he is still thinking about and and not making to much public on if we will use them or not.
Reaction:
I think we should use them. If we can do anything that makes it so less troops have to go over and fight somewhere then I'm all for it. I'd rather spend more money than more lives.
Connection:
We are learning about the cabinet of the president and in this situation he is probably talking to his cabinet and more specifically the secretary of defense. He uses his advisors to help him figure out what he will do in situations exactly like this.
Monday, February 24, 2014
http://conservbyte.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Democrats-face-reality-300x207.jpg
summary
This cartoon shows democrats in a fictional world. The point of this cartoon was to display how far fetch and unreal obamacare and raising the minimum is without harming the economy. Thats why the world is fictional, it is a perfect world. With success comes sacrifice, one can not create something without giving up something in return.
reaction
The reason for picking this cartoon was because I found it humorous. Also the cartoon had lots of color which caught my eye, the cartoon also spoke of ridicule. I agree with what this cartoon and how obamacare and raising the minimum wage is a very bad idea for the economy.
connection
the connection the artist made with obamacare reminds me of what mrs. ahrens said about a hot fudge sundae, republicans want to cut taxes but want all the benefits. Like eating the sundae but not wanting all the calories. The best way to handle the situation isn't one party or another but a compromise, in the gray area.
summary
This cartoon shows democrats in a fictional world. The point of this cartoon was to display how far fetch and unreal obamacare and raising the minimum is without harming the economy. Thats why the world is fictional, it is a perfect world. With success comes sacrifice, one can not create something without giving up something in return.
reaction
The reason for picking this cartoon was because I found it humorous. Also the cartoon had lots of color which caught my eye, the cartoon also spoke of ridicule. I agree with what this cartoon and how obamacare and raising the minimum wage is a very bad idea for the economy.
connection
the connection the artist made with obamacare reminds me of what mrs. ahrens said about a hot fudge sundae, republicans want to cut taxes but want all the benefits. Like eating the sundae but not wanting all the calories. The best way to handle the situation isn't one party or another but a compromise, in the gray area.
Christian Steffen- Political Cartoon Post- Democratic Convention
Democratic Convention and Obama
http://emmafarison.wikispaces.com/file/view/dnc-crasher-lk0815ad.jpg/145383975/300x226/dnc-crasher-lk0815ad.jpg
http://emmafarison.wikispaces.com/file/view/dnc-crasher-lk0815ad.jpg/145383975/300x226/dnc-crasher-lk0815ad.jpg
Summary- I think that the political cartoon is clearly a slam against Obama. It depicts Obama at the Democratic National Convention. Due to his low popularity, his endorsement could actually hurt the nominees if they are associated with Obama and therefore associated with the terrible economy and every other problem facing America right now. It shows that the public isn't content with how Obama has been running the country or perhaps, just the shape that the country is in. The cartoon is used to make people laugh but also to get a political point across. This cartoonist clearly doesn't approve of Obama and his goals.
Reaction- I think that the cartoon is very funny. I agree with the cartoon as i do not think that Obama has helped this country more than he has hurt it. This may come from a strong value in the economy of the country, and how it hasn't improved since he has been in office. However it isn't that he hasn't helped the situation, its that he has actually hurt the situation by continued spending. The cartoon could have many potential reasons for depicting Obama as an undesirable character to be endorsed by, but by far it is probably his approval ratings in the polls and how low they are.
Connection- I can connect this political cartoon to Congress and how they get re-elected. Congressional seats are up for re election every two years in the House of Representatives and every six years in the Senate. In almost every case, the presidents party loses seats in both the Senate and the House. This is fairly consistent. This could be because many people are not ever satisfied with how things are going and constantly want more than the presidency could give. Whatever the reason, many officials running for election or re- election do not necessarily want a recommendation from Obama because they don't want to be associated with Obama any more than they have to. This would be a concern for the Democrats, just like the Democratic Convention doesn't want Obama to be a part of it.
McKenna Earnest Economics Governors talk bipartisanship, then feud over Obama’s economic policies
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2014/02/24/governors-talk-bipartisanship-then-feud-over-obamas-economic-policies/
Summary: Governors met on Monday, February 24th to discuss Obamas spending. Republican Bobby Jindal stated his opinion that Obama wasn't spending the right way. He goes on to say that Obama shouldn't be wasting his time with raising the minimum wage, when he could be making money off of Canadian oil. A Democratic governor Daniel Malloy then stepped up to defend the way Obama is running things by saying that Jindals earlier statement "is the most partisan thing he's heard all week". He brought up another point later that maybe not everyone wants the Canadian oil pumping through the states.
Reaction: I agree with oth sides of this argument because making the minimum wage higher is a tough thing to do because of the fact that there really isn't any extra money laying around so we can pay our waitress' and fry cooks more than the minimum wage.but then I also agre with the democrat in the facet that this republican can't just expect Obama to start taking Canadian oil without any discussion over the matter. There's a lot to be buffed out with both of these options.
Connection: If the republican governor Jindal wanted to make a difference in this situation, he could filibuster. He could filibuster for Obama to stop the minimum wage raise by either trying to make a difference with the bad points of it, or he could just bring it to everyone's attention and make the public realize that it might be a bad idea. He could also filibuster to make the Canadian oil thing happen as we'll or at least get the public eye on the option.
Summary: Governors met on Monday, February 24th to discuss Obamas spending. Republican Bobby Jindal stated his opinion that Obama wasn't spending the right way. He goes on to say that Obama shouldn't be wasting his time with raising the minimum wage, when he could be making money off of Canadian oil. A Democratic governor Daniel Malloy then stepped up to defend the way Obama is running things by saying that Jindals earlier statement "is the most partisan thing he's heard all week". He brought up another point later that maybe not everyone wants the Canadian oil pumping through the states.
Reaction: I agree with oth sides of this argument because making the minimum wage higher is a tough thing to do because of the fact that there really isn't any extra money laying around so we can pay our waitress' and fry cooks more than the minimum wage.but then I also agre with the democrat in the facet that this republican can't just expect Obama to start taking Canadian oil without any discussion over the matter. There's a lot to be buffed out with both of these options.
Connection: If the republican governor Jindal wanted to make a difference in this situation, he could filibuster. He could filibuster for Obama to stop the minimum wage raise by either trying to make a difference with the bad points of it, or he could just bring it to everyone's attention and make the public realize that it might be a bad idea. He could also filibuster to make the Canadian oil thing happen as we'll or at least get the public eye on the option.
Sunday, February 23, 2014
Hannah Chin National Security 1 - Saudi Relative of 9/11 Hijacker Pleads Guilty at Guantanamo Bay to War Charges
Link: http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/saudi-relative-of-911-hijacker-pleads-guilty-at-guantanamo-bay-to-war-charges/2014/02/20/53aaf13a-9a3d-11e3-b931-0204122c514b_story.html
Summary: Ahmed Darbi, the brother-in-law of a 9/11 hijacker, pleaded guilty to war crimes at a Guantanamo Bay court hearing this past month. The military's chief prosecutor said that he will be sentenced in three and a half years. As part of the plea deal, Darbi is likely to testify against other detainees at the Guantanamo Bay facility. Darbi could potentially be repeatriated to Saudi Arabia to serve the remainder of his sentence in a prison. He faces between nine and fifteen years behind bars. He is accused of helping to plan the bombing of a French oil tanker. He could possibly be a key witness for other cases similar to the bombing, specifically against Abd Nashiri, who attacked a United States warship in Yemen in 2000. By being prosecuted in the United States, Darbi has a chance of having a forseeable future with his family back home.
Reaction: I honestly believe that this is a double win situation for the United States. Darbi is still imprisoned in the Guantanamo Bay facility for three years and they will receive his testimonies. Although Darbi will be allowed to finish his sentence in Saudi Arabia and be able to see his family, the United States is still benefiting from his sentence.
Connection: I believe this situation can connect to the Homeland Security department of the Cabinet. The Homeland Security Department is responsible for protecting against terrorism. Regardless of whether or not Darbi will be repeatriated back to Saudi Arabia to serve the rest of his sentence, the goal of the department is to protect citizens of the United States from terrorism. His testimonies will be paramount in protecting our national security from threats.
Summary: Ahmed Darbi, the brother-in-law of a 9/11 hijacker, pleaded guilty to war crimes at a Guantanamo Bay court hearing this past month. The military's chief prosecutor said that he will be sentenced in three and a half years. As part of the plea deal, Darbi is likely to testify against other detainees at the Guantanamo Bay facility. Darbi could potentially be repeatriated to Saudi Arabia to serve the remainder of his sentence in a prison. He faces between nine and fifteen years behind bars. He is accused of helping to plan the bombing of a French oil tanker. He could possibly be a key witness for other cases similar to the bombing, specifically against Abd Nashiri, who attacked a United States warship in Yemen in 2000. By being prosecuted in the United States, Darbi has a chance of having a forseeable future with his family back home.
Reaction: I honestly believe that this is a double win situation for the United States. Darbi is still imprisoned in the Guantanamo Bay facility for three years and they will receive his testimonies. Although Darbi will be allowed to finish his sentence in Saudi Arabia and be able to see his family, the United States is still benefiting from his sentence.
Connection: I believe this situation can connect to the Homeland Security department of the Cabinet. The Homeland Security Department is responsible for protecting against terrorism. Regardless of whether or not Darbi will be repeatriated back to Saudi Arabia to serve the rest of his sentence, the goal of the department is to protect citizens of the United States from terrorism. His testimonies will be paramount in protecting our national security from threats.
Tuesday, February 18, 2014
Matt Van Horn- Social Welfare- Single Mothers are not Americas real welfare queens
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/01/10/single-mothers-are-not-america-s-real-welfare-queens.html
Summary: The article basically explains how over the past few years conservatives have overblown the proportion and picture on social welfare and single women. Conservatives try to draw the viewpoint that single women are totally dependent on the government. Making accusations that single women our avoiding marriage to milk the benefits of the government. Conservatives try to make it seem like single women our the largest group continuing to eagerly yank out tax-payer money; but in all actuality 53% of all cash entitlements go to people over the age of 65. 20 to disabled and 18% to working people, leaving only 9% for non working people.
Reaction- The article was obviously under a lot of bias from the author. Even no it is somewhat biased I agree with what she has to say. Single mothers often get a bad rap in today's society, as free loading, good for nothing, basically dead weight that the country has to support. Well in this article it gave some statistics of what actually gets a higher percentage of cash entitlements. These statistics prove that single women are not just sitting around free loading off of the government, it shows that the little money they receive is just a safety net to support their children and themselves.
Connection- You can make a connection with the basics of what a democratic governments job is to do. Which is to work for the good of the people. Leaving single moms out in the cold would be a very detrimental to the poverty level of young women in this country. Its our governments job to ensure that everyone has the basic necessities to get by without suffering.
Summary: The article basically explains how over the past few years conservatives have overblown the proportion and picture on social welfare and single women. Conservatives try to draw the viewpoint that single women are totally dependent on the government. Making accusations that single women our avoiding marriage to milk the benefits of the government. Conservatives try to make it seem like single women our the largest group continuing to eagerly yank out tax-payer money; but in all actuality 53% of all cash entitlements go to people over the age of 65. 20 to disabled and 18% to working people, leaving only 9% for non working people.
Reaction- The article was obviously under a lot of bias from the author. Even no it is somewhat biased I agree with what she has to say. Single mothers often get a bad rap in today's society, as free loading, good for nothing, basically dead weight that the country has to support. Well in this article it gave some statistics of what actually gets a higher percentage of cash entitlements. These statistics prove that single women are not just sitting around free loading off of the government, it shows that the little money they receive is just a safety net to support their children and themselves.
Connection- You can make a connection with the basics of what a democratic governments job is to do. Which is to work for the good of the people. Leaving single moms out in the cold would be a very detrimental to the poverty level of young women in this country. Its our governments job to ensure that everyone has the basic necessities to get by without suffering.
Hunter Williams Social Welfare 2: Florida Moves To Manage Health Care For Foster Kids
Read more at... http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/florida-moves-to-manage-health-care-for-foster-kids/2014/02/13/7d4ce066-9498-11e3-9e13-770265cf4962_story.html
Summary: Florida is starting to develop a healthcare plan to provide benefits to foster care children and children that live off of welfare. The desired effect is to close the gap between the children who do have healthcare, and the children who are less fortunate. 400,000 foster children in America do not receive proper healthcare due to the fact of constant relocation. Healthcare providers should also consider all aspects of a foster/underprivileged child's life, like abuse, mental state of being, etc. All children also deserve preventive care.
Reaction: I somewhat was shocked by the statistics in this article, but nonetheless, this problem can be easily eradicated with the help of the tax payers money. By closing the gap, equality is insured for all children in the state of Florida. I support this policy all the way. Children deserve to be equally represented to other children and be understood of their pasts/histories. There's always negatives though such as an increase in everyday "normal" families having to pay that extra 5 cents to help a poor kid get some healthcare. Healthcare for every child should be a necessity.
Connection: My connection has not exactly happened yet, but I think this policy could develop into a healthy policy laboratory for every state in our nation. Every state watches each other to see what the other state's policies can do for them. It's almost like a retrospective look at policies by other states.
Summary: Florida is starting to develop a healthcare plan to provide benefits to foster care children and children that live off of welfare. The desired effect is to close the gap between the children who do have healthcare, and the children who are less fortunate. 400,000 foster children in America do not receive proper healthcare due to the fact of constant relocation. Healthcare providers should also consider all aspects of a foster/underprivileged child's life, like abuse, mental state of being, etc. All children also deserve preventive care.
Reaction: I somewhat was shocked by the statistics in this article, but nonetheless, this problem can be easily eradicated with the help of the tax payers money. By closing the gap, equality is insured for all children in the state of Florida. I support this policy all the way. Children deserve to be equally represented to other children and be understood of their pasts/histories. There's always negatives though such as an increase in everyday "normal" families having to pay that extra 5 cents to help a poor kid get some healthcare. Healthcare for every child should be a necessity.
Connection: My connection has not exactly happened yet, but I think this policy could develop into a healthy policy laboratory for every state in our nation. Every state watches each other to see what the other state's policies can do for them. It's almost like a retrospective look at policies by other states.
social welfare nick steinke
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/14/us/california-octuplets-mother-charged.html?_r=0
Summary
This article shows the corruption of the general welfare system. It is about Nadya Sulemen otherwise known as octuplets mom. She had found a way to cheat the walfare system, she did not record all her earnings of last year to get more welfare and funding for her 14 kids. She was awarded with over 30,000 dollars from public appearances but did not record it in total earnings receiving 16,000 dollars of welfare money.
reaction
This honestly does not surprise me. Many people take advantage of the government hand outs. If one is willing to help free of charge why not take the help/money? People without families living with roomates and working receive food stamps. Also people that fully recover from surgery can still receive pain killers. People become weak and need the government and are less motivated to do things for themselves when they know the government will just give it to them. This leads to a weak country and why too much government is bad.
connection
This type of government relates to pluralism. The framers wanted a strong government but not too strong where the people had no say. Too much of something good is bad, more people relying on th government the larger the government needs to be which leaves less people to pay taxes for the government workers and people receiving welfare. There needs to be a balance betweem too much and too little government, and pluralism is the key to victory.
Summary
This article shows the corruption of the general welfare system. It is about Nadya Sulemen otherwise known as octuplets mom. She had found a way to cheat the walfare system, she did not record all her earnings of last year to get more welfare and funding for her 14 kids. She was awarded with over 30,000 dollars from public appearances but did not record it in total earnings receiving 16,000 dollars of welfare money.
reaction
This honestly does not surprise me. Many people take advantage of the government hand outs. If one is willing to help free of charge why not take the help/money? People without families living with roomates and working receive food stamps. Also people that fully recover from surgery can still receive pain killers. People become weak and need the government and are less motivated to do things for themselves when they know the government will just give it to them. This leads to a weak country and why too much government is bad.
connection
This type of government relates to pluralism. The framers wanted a strong government but not too strong where the people had no say. Too much of something good is bad, more people relying on th government the larger the government needs to be which leaves less people to pay taxes for the government workers and people receiving welfare. There needs to be a balance betweem too much and too little government, and pluralism is the key to victory.
Liz Flanagan National Security- Security Forces in Egypt Detain Employee of American Embassy
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/13/world/middleeast/egypt.html
Summary- Security forces have detained an Egyptian employee of the US Embassy who worked in connection with the Muslim brotherhood. This event has made those who deal with the Islamist opposition uneasy because if the close ties with our country. Egyptian security officials say that Ahmed Alaiba participated in riot demonstrations in support of the Muslim brotherhood's president last summer. However, the pro government Egyptian news media accuse the United States as a whole of conspiring with the brotherhood, which is now an officially outlawed terrorist group.
Reaction- I feel like this event is something we should have seen coming. When we work so closely with so many people from a country who is threat to us, we should be prepared for betrayal. Although the situation has been addressed, it still should make us uneasy and conscious of who we entrust in the future. While we shouldn't distrust the country as a whole, the individuals we allow into our embassy should be inter closer monitoring.
Connection- Foreign policy and national security are an important part of our country's well being and stability. One especially important committee(s) on the House/Senate is that that deals with Foregun affairs. Their decisions allow for us to feel protected and do our best to detain an deli are the threats outside of our country.
Summary- Security forces have detained an Egyptian employee of the US Embassy who worked in connection with the Muslim brotherhood. This event has made those who deal with the Islamist opposition uneasy because if the close ties with our country. Egyptian security officials say that Ahmed Alaiba participated in riot demonstrations in support of the Muslim brotherhood's president last summer. However, the pro government Egyptian news media accuse the United States as a whole of conspiring with the brotherhood, which is now an officially outlawed terrorist group.
Reaction- I feel like this event is something we should have seen coming. When we work so closely with so many people from a country who is threat to us, we should be prepared for betrayal. Although the situation has been addressed, it still should make us uneasy and conscious of who we entrust in the future. While we shouldn't distrust the country as a whole, the individuals we allow into our embassy should be inter closer monitoring.
Connection- Foreign policy and national security are an important part of our country's well being and stability. One especially important committee(s) on the House/Senate is that that deals with Foregun affairs. Their decisions allow for us to feel protected and do our best to detain an deli are the threats outside of our country.
"Economy Is Expanding, but Obama’s Legacy May Be Slipping Away" - Haidyn Hank - Economics #1
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/31/business/us-economy-grew-3-2-in-fourth-quarter.html?_r=1
Summary:
In the final quarter of 2013, the economy grew by 3.2 percent, showing a comeback from the dismal economy we have experienced since 2007. The president, despite his claim that this will be a "comeback year", still has a lot of work to do to get the economy back where it should be. According to the New York Times, "After including the latest figures for growth on Thursday, the economy has expanded at an annual rate of 1.8 percent under President Obama, half the pace of growth in the first five years of the Clinton administration,and below the 2.5 percent annual growth rate for President Bush between December 2000 and December 2005 in the same years." The amount of disposable per capita income has lessened, rising only 0.6 percent in the last five years. While the percentage of unemployed citizens has gone down, it is still at 6.7 percent. In addition, Wall Street has recently been rebounding from the poor economy. The biggest factor in having a great fourth quarter was "healthy" consumer spending. People were buying more durable goods such as washers, dryers, and televisions, as well as items such as food and clothing. Trade was also a big factor because we had an increase in exports and a big decrease in imports. There was also a decrease in the housing market, possibly due to temporary pauses in construction due to weather conditions.
Reaction:
I have not payed much attention to the economy, but I just assumed it was a train wreck and was in horrible condition based on the things I had heard from the people around me. It is a little bit reassuring to know that the economy, though slowly, is making its way back to where it should be. I realized that construction would have to be halted because of weather conditions, but it never occurred to me that this also played a role in our economy. Part of the increase in consumer spending in the final quarter of 2013 was likely due to holiday and Black Friday shopping, which I also never really thought of as a boost to our economy, just as businesses making millions of dollars in one night.
Connection:
The economy can be linked to the government because the economy plays a role in proposed policies and bills. This means that a bill could be proposed that has to do with lowering or raising taxes due to the current economy, something that (I believe) has been seen before. It could also result in bills for a variety of other things that interest groups want because they may think that since the economy is getting better that the government should be able to spend more money on the things that they want to see get done. Bills and policies are easily shaped around the state of the economy in a multitude of ways based on the ups and downs of the economy and how it is affecting their area or the country as a whole. If the economy is becoming particularly bad in one area, they may seek out financial aid from the government, assuming that the government can afford to help them because of little rises in the economy, not realizing that there is still a long way to go before things get back to the way they should be.
Summary:
In the final quarter of 2013, the economy grew by 3.2 percent, showing a comeback from the dismal economy we have experienced since 2007. The president, despite his claim that this will be a "comeback year", still has a lot of work to do to get the economy back where it should be. According to the New York Times, "After including the latest figures for growth on Thursday, the economy has expanded at an annual rate of 1.8 percent under President Obama, half the pace of growth in the first five years of the Clinton administration,and below the 2.5 percent annual growth rate for President Bush between December 2000 and December 2005 in the same years." The amount of disposable per capita income has lessened, rising only 0.6 percent in the last five years. While the percentage of unemployed citizens has gone down, it is still at 6.7 percent. In addition, Wall Street has recently been rebounding from the poor economy. The biggest factor in having a great fourth quarter was "healthy" consumer spending. People were buying more durable goods such as washers, dryers, and televisions, as well as items such as food and clothing. Trade was also a big factor because we had an increase in exports and a big decrease in imports. There was also a decrease in the housing market, possibly due to temporary pauses in construction due to weather conditions.
Reaction:
I have not payed much attention to the economy, but I just assumed it was a train wreck and was in horrible condition based on the things I had heard from the people around me. It is a little bit reassuring to know that the economy, though slowly, is making its way back to where it should be. I realized that construction would have to be halted because of weather conditions, but it never occurred to me that this also played a role in our economy. Part of the increase in consumer spending in the final quarter of 2013 was likely due to holiday and Black Friday shopping, which I also never really thought of as a boost to our economy, just as businesses making millions of dollars in one night.
Connection:
The economy can be linked to the government because the economy plays a role in proposed policies and bills. This means that a bill could be proposed that has to do with lowering or raising taxes due to the current economy, something that (I believe) has been seen before. It could also result in bills for a variety of other things that interest groups want because they may think that since the economy is getting better that the government should be able to spend more money on the things that they want to see get done. Bills and policies are easily shaped around the state of the economy in a multitude of ways based on the ups and downs of the economy and how it is affecting their area or the country as a whole. If the economy is becoming particularly bad in one area, they may seek out financial aid from the government, assuming that the government can afford to help them because of little rises in the economy, not realizing that there is still a long way to go before things get back to the way they should be.
Blake bodenschatz enviromental laws hamper work
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/washington/story/2011-10-27/border-patrol-environmental-laws/50952930/1
Summary: Boarder patrol states that environmental property restricts them from driving vehicles on that land to stop illegal immigrants. More and more lawmakers state that more smugglers travel these areas due to having less or no patrol. Three congressional panels have moved to give boarder patrol unlimited access. Many people are against this and were against the building of the wall stating that it is just an excuse to get around enviromental protection. Some environmentalist are against letting boarder patrol drive on the land because it cause water to get in the tires and evaporate instead of growing vegetation.
Reaction: Frankly I think that boarder patrol should be able to go on these areas that are environmentally protected because they need to do their job not just in one area and not in another because it is protected. It just causes more smugglers to get across the boarder easier and needs to be stopped.
Connection: This is similar in the past with any other kind of smuggling, mainly prohibiton. Tht even with efforts to stop smuggling they will always find a way to get their items across. Either drugs or alcohol the boarder patrol has to have a careful watch over what is happening and what is coming over the boarder.
Summary: Boarder patrol states that environmental property restricts them from driving vehicles on that land to stop illegal immigrants. More and more lawmakers state that more smugglers travel these areas due to having less or no patrol. Three congressional panels have moved to give boarder patrol unlimited access. Many people are against this and were against the building of the wall stating that it is just an excuse to get around enviromental protection. Some environmentalist are against letting boarder patrol drive on the land because it cause water to get in the tires and evaporate instead of growing vegetation.
Reaction: Frankly I think that boarder patrol should be able to go on these areas that are environmentally protected because they need to do their job not just in one area and not in another because it is protected. It just causes more smugglers to get across the boarder easier and needs to be stopped.
Connection: This is similar in the past with any other kind of smuggling, mainly prohibiton. Tht even with efforts to stop smuggling they will always find a way to get their items across. Either drugs or alcohol the boarder patrol has to have a careful watch over what is happening and what is coming over the boarder.
Environment 2 Carter Brown Billionsire pushes for the environment
Billionaire pushes for environment
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/18/tom-steyer-2014-elections_n_4809013.html
Summary:
A rich billionaire, Tom Steyer, is pushing hard to keep the environment safe he spent thousands on making advertisements during the last election and is now backing candidates for that support his cause. He has also bee. Writing letters to congress about issues like the pipeline.
Reaction:
I like this guys because he is really trying to do good in the world and he using his vast resources for good. Plus he is spending so much that it is really helping.
Connection:
We just looked at how PACS affect campaigns and he is basically doing that. He is making issue ads and making it so that one person looks much better. This one guys is making his voice heard about his issue and also using the going public tactic we learned about.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/18/tom-steyer-2014-elections_n_4809013.html
Summary:
A rich billionaire, Tom Steyer, is pushing hard to keep the environment safe he spent thousands on making advertisements during the last election and is now backing candidates for that support his cause. He has also bee. Writing letters to congress about issues like the pipeline.
Reaction:
I like this guys because he is really trying to do good in the world and he using his vast resources for good. Plus he is spending so much that it is really helping.
Connection:
We just looked at how PACS affect campaigns and he is basically doing that. He is making issue ads and making it so that one person looks much better. This one guys is making his voice heard about his issue and also using the going public tactic we learned about.
David Niska: Economic Policcymaking- Regulating and Benefiting Business
Summary: In the early twenty-first century, there were many corporate scandals which in turn led to many new business regulations. In 2002, Congress passed a law that had stronger penalties for individuals and companies that engaged in stock and securities fraud. With this, came the Accounting Oversight Board which is within the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. These new requirements would further regulate accounting industry practices. Since the new regulations were placed on business, many business executives complained about the additional burden required by government. However, there is a benefit that the government gives to business, and to individuals, that is written in the Constitution. More specifically, this is the protection for inventions and creative works defined in the form of patents and copyrights.
Reaction: I am glad that the government stepped in to protect investors and the public from deceptive practices, stock manipulation, and equity market fraud and that legislators upheld what was written in the Constitution. However, I believe that government regulation and intervention needs to be carefully exercised so that our companies remain competitive in both the domestic and international market place. A vital corporate environment is good for the American public, and America's workforce who earn a wage and enjoy a standard of living that has never previously been experienced in the history of world humanity.
Connection: This can be linked to the Copyright Clause: "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries."
Reaction: I am glad that the government stepped in to protect investors and the public from deceptive practices, stock manipulation, and equity market fraud and that legislators upheld what was written in the Constitution. However, I believe that government regulation and intervention needs to be carefully exercised so that our companies remain competitive in both the domestic and international market place. A vital corporate environment is good for the American public, and America's workforce who earn a wage and enjoy a standard of living that has never previously been experienced in the history of world humanity.
Connection: This can be linked to the Copyright Clause: "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries."
Austin Dreher - NSA phone data collection far more limited than had been disclosed - National Security
http://articles.latimes.com/2014/feb/07/nation/la-na-nsa-phones-20140208/2
Summary - Critics have been questioning the practice of the NSA's collection of phone records for quite some time. Many argue that this practice is unnecessary and a violation of our rights. Upon the disclosure of the fact that only about one third of phone calls are being tracked in the first place, this only leads to more confusion regarding the necessity of such a practice. The questions only increase when it is shown that the use of land lines (which are tracked) is on a sharp decline. The NSA would like to expand the amount of phones they can track by making themselves able to track the records of cell phones, but most are against it. During Obama's January 17th speech, Obama said that he would end the program as it is, in order to ease concerns. As of February 6th, the NSA needs a judges approval to claim records, unless an emergency is underway.
Reaction - Overall, I am pleased with Obama's new policy concerning the NSA's ability to check phone records. Now citizens won't have to fear the NSA's influence on them, and can be at ease regarding the whole situation. The decision to require a judge's approval before records can be released is, in the long run, an improvement over the previous system. However, the section that reads: "unless an emergency is underway" worries me slightly. What defines an emergency? How far can the NSA stretch their privileges regarding these records?
Connection - This situation can relate to the influence of interest groups over executive decision-making. If there were no groups expressing their concern over the matter, than there would have been no need to change the system at all. If there had been no groups advocating for these changes, the NSA could have continued to freely have open access to these phone records without consequence.
Summary - Critics have been questioning the practice of the NSA's collection of phone records for quite some time. Many argue that this practice is unnecessary and a violation of our rights. Upon the disclosure of the fact that only about one third of phone calls are being tracked in the first place, this only leads to more confusion regarding the necessity of such a practice. The questions only increase when it is shown that the use of land lines (which are tracked) is on a sharp decline. The NSA would like to expand the amount of phones they can track by making themselves able to track the records of cell phones, but most are against it. During Obama's January 17th speech, Obama said that he would end the program as it is, in order to ease concerns. As of February 6th, the NSA needs a judges approval to claim records, unless an emergency is underway.
Reaction - Overall, I am pleased with Obama's new policy concerning the NSA's ability to check phone records. Now citizens won't have to fear the NSA's influence on them, and can be at ease regarding the whole situation. The decision to require a judge's approval before records can be released is, in the long run, an improvement over the previous system. However, the section that reads: "unless an emergency is underway" worries me slightly. What defines an emergency? How far can the NSA stretch their privileges regarding these records?
Connection - This situation can relate to the influence of interest groups over executive decision-making. If there were no groups expressing their concern over the matter, than there would have been no need to change the system at all. If there had been no groups advocating for these changes, the NSA could have continued to freely have open access to these phone records without consequence.
Kylee Cangas- Obama Orders News Efficiency For Big Trucks (Environment)
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/19/us/politics/obama-to-request-new-rules-for-cutting-truck-pollution.html?ref=us&_r=0
Summary- The article goes in to detail about Obama's latest request to reduce emission from trucks and semis to reduce pollution. He believes this is another way to contribute to his legacy by positively affecting the government. He hoped to introduce new restrictions on how much exhaust trucks could give off. His argument included that by doing this we not only help the environment but lower the amount of gas needed making it cheaper. People against it state that it will only work if it upholds trials and that it could create expensive vehicles unattainable to some companies and could cause for a lack of safety.
Reaction- I think this is a positive change that the President is trying to bring about. Helping the environment is definitely something that isn't very popular and it's nice to see his interest in it. Also, the possibility of needing less fuel means that the alterations would eventually pay for themselves. I think that in order to put these into place they would need smooth transitions and it would need to be reasonable restrictions. However I do support this idea and I think any change can help this problem that not many people value.
Connection- This somewhat connects to what we talked about in class where second term presidents approaching the end of their time in office often do things they wouldn't if running again. Things like helping the environment, or things that may not be popular with the people but helpful regardless. It also relates to what we discussed where the president has an easier time getting public attention over congress, both of which have their separate opinions. However the president was able to rally support by speaking in front of the people.
Summary- The article goes in to detail about Obama's latest request to reduce emission from trucks and semis to reduce pollution. He believes this is another way to contribute to his legacy by positively affecting the government. He hoped to introduce new restrictions on how much exhaust trucks could give off. His argument included that by doing this we not only help the environment but lower the amount of gas needed making it cheaper. People against it state that it will only work if it upholds trials and that it could create expensive vehicles unattainable to some companies and could cause for a lack of safety.
Reaction- I think this is a positive change that the President is trying to bring about. Helping the environment is definitely something that isn't very popular and it's nice to see his interest in it. Also, the possibility of needing less fuel means that the alterations would eventually pay for themselves. I think that in order to put these into place they would need smooth transitions and it would need to be reasonable restrictions. However I do support this idea and I think any change can help this problem that not many people value.
Connection- This somewhat connects to what we talked about in class where second term presidents approaching the end of their time in office often do things they wouldn't if running again. Things like helping the environment, or things that may not be popular with the people but helpful regardless. It also relates to what we discussed where the president has an easier time getting public attention over congress, both of which have their separate opinions. However the president was able to rally support by speaking in front of the people.
Jason Erbst- National security- "Homeland Security is seeking a national license plate tracking system"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/homeland-security-is-seeking-a-national-license-plate-tracking-system/2014/02/18/56474ae8-9816-11e3-9616-d367fa6ea99b_story.html
Summary: this article says that there is proposal of a national license plate tracking company. This company would collect data of every license plate issued and could potentially follow this person through life with this data alone. It is said that this data would only be accessed in situations where it could help with a crime or to track immigrants. This has huge potential for good and evil.
Reaction: this is potentially a great idea to help solve crimes, track wanted people, etc. although it can be abused and track people for whatever reason which goes back to the Edward snoden scandal. This would upset a lot of people because everyone always jumps to the negatives while overlooking all the possible good situations.
Connection: this could have problems with the fourth amendment. Many people will not want their simple license plate even just having the ability to be tracked. This can violate privacy and the search and seizure clause. Although I'm sure things would gets arranged to where things are not violated.
Summary: this article says that there is proposal of a national license plate tracking company. This company would collect data of every license plate issued and could potentially follow this person through life with this data alone. It is said that this data would only be accessed in situations where it could help with a crime or to track immigrants. This has huge potential for good and evil.
Reaction: this is potentially a great idea to help solve crimes, track wanted people, etc. although it can be abused and track people for whatever reason which goes back to the Edward snoden scandal. This would upset a lot of people because everyone always jumps to the negatives while overlooking all the possible good situations.
Connection: this could have problems with the fourth amendment. Many people will not want their simple license plate even just having the ability to be tracked. This can violate privacy and the search and seizure clause. Although I'm sure things would gets arranged to where things are not violated.
Emma Walraven-Social Welfare-Food Stamp Use Among Military Rises Again
http://money.cnn.com/2014/02/17/news/economy/military-food-stamps/
Summary: The use of food stamps at military grocers has increased since the beginning of the recession in 2008. This increase reflects the weak economic recovery. In 2012, there was a 30% unemployment rate among spouses of active-duty military, according to a survey by the Military Officers Association of America released last week. Much of this unemployment could be due to the frequent relocation the military often requires, making it difficult to find work. Another possible reason being that during the recession, the eligibility required for food stamps was lowered, making it easier to apply. Base pay for a new soldier with a spouse and kid is $20,000, just above the poverty line. In 2013, Operation Homefront received 2,968 emergency requests for food help, more than any other kind of help. The numbers are lower than they were two years ago, but still significantly higher than in 2008. On the bright side, the increase in use of food stamps at military grocers as slowed down a bit. Congress allowed cuts in the food stamps program this previous November. Active-duty military families were affected by those cuts.
Reaction: I think it's really sad to know that so many families are having to live off of food stamps. It is good, however, that they are at least able to feed their children. It's kind of sad to know the numbers have increased, although good that it has slowed a bit. Honestly though, I am not very good with economics so I don't know if $20,000 is enough to support yourself.
Connection: In Chapter 12, it says Congress has the power to oversee anything to do with bureaucracy and budgets and such. This relates to the article because Congress is the one who controls the food stamps and how much they're worth. They're also the ones who decided to cut some off.
Summary: The use of food stamps at military grocers has increased since the beginning of the recession in 2008. This increase reflects the weak economic recovery. In 2012, there was a 30% unemployment rate among spouses of active-duty military, according to a survey by the Military Officers Association of America released last week. Much of this unemployment could be due to the frequent relocation the military often requires, making it difficult to find work. Another possible reason being that during the recession, the eligibility required for food stamps was lowered, making it easier to apply. Base pay for a new soldier with a spouse and kid is $20,000, just above the poverty line. In 2013, Operation Homefront received 2,968 emergency requests for food help, more than any other kind of help. The numbers are lower than they were two years ago, but still significantly higher than in 2008. On the bright side, the increase in use of food stamps at military grocers as slowed down a bit. Congress allowed cuts in the food stamps program this previous November. Active-duty military families were affected by those cuts.
Reaction: I think it's really sad to know that so many families are having to live off of food stamps. It is good, however, that they are at least able to feed their children. It's kind of sad to know the numbers have increased, although good that it has slowed a bit. Honestly though, I am not very good with economics so I don't know if $20,000 is enough to support yourself.
Connection: In Chapter 12, it says Congress has the power to oversee anything to do with bureaucracy and budgets and such. This relates to the article because Congress is the one who controls the food stamps and how much they're worth. They're also the ones who decided to cut some off.
Jack Doyle Hey Kids: Have a Cocktail Today, Because Obamacare Is Cool
http://blog.heritage.org/2014/02/15/hey-kids-cocktail-today-obamacare-cool/
Summary: Obama administration hosted a "youth enrollment day" to get 20 somethings not on their parents plans to sign up for obamacare. This consisted of pub crawls, online ads, etcetera. Ironically, it occured on the same day the Social Security Administration shut the website down because it is not secure. "Generation Opportunity" is an anti obamacare group trying to encourage young people not to incur the expenses of the sick and old and stand up against obamacare. After all, the fines for not being insured are far less than the monthly cost of insurance under the bill.
Reaction: Obamacare has been a train wreck since day one. Like Miley and Liam, this is going to leave one group (Obama) looking insane, and the other (the american public) unchanged. The website, which takes SSNs, medical histories, and other personal info, HAD NO SECURITY! If the bill worked as it should it would be great, cheaper better healthcare for everyone. But it is a government program, and if we have learned nothing else its that government does not work.
Connection: I believe obamacare to be an attack on our personal freedoms. Does me not signing up for the "service" harm someone else? No. Does it keep someone else from using their freedom to sign up? No. If burning the flag is symbolic speech, then my refusal to sign up for this "service" should be as well.
Summary: Obama administration hosted a "youth enrollment day" to get 20 somethings not on their parents plans to sign up for obamacare. This consisted of pub crawls, online ads, etcetera. Ironically, it occured on the same day the Social Security Administration shut the website down because it is not secure. "Generation Opportunity" is an anti obamacare group trying to encourage young people not to incur the expenses of the sick and old and stand up against obamacare. After all, the fines for not being insured are far less than the monthly cost of insurance under the bill.
Reaction: Obamacare has been a train wreck since day one. Like Miley and Liam, this is going to leave one group (Obama) looking insane, and the other (the american public) unchanged. The website, which takes SSNs, medical histories, and other personal info, HAD NO SECURITY! If the bill worked as it should it would be great, cheaper better healthcare for everyone. But it is a government program, and if we have learned nothing else its that government does not work.
Connection: I believe obamacare to be an attack on our personal freedoms. Does me not signing up for the "service" harm someone else? No. Does it keep someone else from using their freedom to sign up? No. If burning the flag is symbolic speech, then my refusal to sign up for this "service" should be as well.
Annclare thachil-social welfare "how killing the unemployment benefits could kill the economic growth"
http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-01-20/how-killing-unemployment-benefits-could-kill-economic-growth
Summary:
This articles talks about how ending unemployment benefits could have a negative impact on economy. One state is North Carolina, who's economy is going down because of unemployment cuts. Officials are saying that as unemployment benefits are cut, people are giving up on finding jobs. One possible reason for this is because the federal EUC required recipients to look for jobs. When the benefits are cut, they give up because of there aren't any jobs avaliable or the labor market is weak. Researchers are predicting that if the rest of the states follow North Carolina's trend, then there will be a downfall in economy of U.S.
Reaction:
I always thought that cutting unemployment benefits will encourage more people to look for jobs, but I guess I was wrong. It makes sense that people will stop looking for jobs if there benefits are cut off. The economy is already bad, if we cut off unemployment benefits, then there would be more people unemployed. But I feel that this information might be wrong, because not all states are same. We should still make unemployment cuts in some states, because it might still encourage for people to look for jobs.
Connection:
One connection could be that unemployment benefits are controlled by congress. There was probably a bill that was introduced by congress, and then it got made into a law about cutting unemployment benefits. Another connection to government is that unemployment benefits are not means-tested programs. They are government programs avaliable only to individuals below a poverty line. It is not a means-tested program because it is funded by employer.
Henry Crowley Environment Obama Requests New Rules for Cutting Truck Pollution
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/19/us/politics/obama-to-request-new-rules-for-cutting-truck-pollution.html?ref=politics&_r=0
Summary: Vehicles on the road and their toxic emissions account for second largest source of greenhouse pollution. In response to this statistic, President Obama has taken the initiative and, without waiting for Congress' approval, aims to reduce the carbon emissions on the trucks that supply American cities with food and necessities. The president also hopes this change will reduce the need for oil and thus lower prices for regular consumers. Opponents to Obama's environmental changes state that the hopes of having an electric car filled future will threaten safety and vehicle prices. In retaliation, the EPA and Dept. of Transportation plan to work closely with vehicle manufacturers to make the new rules work.
Reaction: I am glad to be informed on the environmental problems of the nation, as they affect us all and they pose a serious threat. The amount of pollution caused by trucks is alarming, yet I am happy to be more informed. It is good that Obama has decided to make a stand for the good green earth on which we live. As stated before in my other posts, the American leaders should focus on making our nation as habitable as possible before dealing in war and foreign affairs.
Connection: Those that oppose the president are lobbying against him. The interest groups of car manufacturers and sellers are influenced to disagree with Obama on the shift for environment. They rally behind the reasoning of expensive and dangerous new vehicles. These are the motives of lobbyists seeking to pull down this idea of lowering carbon emission from trucks.
Summary: Vehicles on the road and their toxic emissions account for second largest source of greenhouse pollution. In response to this statistic, President Obama has taken the initiative and, without waiting for Congress' approval, aims to reduce the carbon emissions on the trucks that supply American cities with food and necessities. The president also hopes this change will reduce the need for oil and thus lower prices for regular consumers. Opponents to Obama's environmental changes state that the hopes of having an electric car filled future will threaten safety and vehicle prices. In retaliation, the EPA and Dept. of Transportation plan to work closely with vehicle manufacturers to make the new rules work.
Reaction: I am glad to be informed on the environmental problems of the nation, as they affect us all and they pose a serious threat. The amount of pollution caused by trucks is alarming, yet I am happy to be more informed. It is good that Obama has decided to make a stand for the good green earth on which we live. As stated before in my other posts, the American leaders should focus on making our nation as habitable as possible before dealing in war and foreign affairs.
Connection: Those that oppose the president are lobbying against him. The interest groups of car manufacturers and sellers are influenced to disagree with Obama on the shift for environment. They rally behind the reasoning of expensive and dangerous new vehicles. These are the motives of lobbyists seeking to pull down this idea of lowering carbon emission from trucks.
U.S. envoy meets controversial Indian leader
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/us-envoy-meets-divisive-indian-leader/2014/02/13/260a7b1a-9475-11e3-9e13-770265cf4962_story.html
Summary: The U.S. government recently ended a political standoff with Indian leader Narendra Modi. The United States wouldn't give him a visa to enter the country and wanted nothing to do with him politically. However his domestic popularity in their upcoming election is forcing the U.S. to relax some of their resentment. Many of the issues our government has with Modi is his alleged complicity in the deadly Hindu-Muslim riots that left hundreds of Muslims dead 11 years ago. This continues to follow him in his political career, but those inside his country are supportive of him.
Reaction: I think this is a good move for our country to a certain extent. We don't want to be enemies with Modi if he rises to power. At the same time though we can't forget what he has been involved in. Our government shouldn't get too involved with him. All that's necessary is to prevent having another enemy in another country.
Connection: This connects to the interaction of parties in Congress. They get along because it is necessary but they look out for what is most beneficial to their party. They also don't trust each ihrer very much.
Summary: The U.S. government recently ended a political standoff with Indian leader Narendra Modi. The United States wouldn't give him a visa to enter the country and wanted nothing to do with him politically. However his domestic popularity in their upcoming election is forcing the U.S. to relax some of their resentment. Many of the issues our government has with Modi is his alleged complicity in the deadly Hindu-Muslim riots that left hundreds of Muslims dead 11 years ago. This continues to follow him in his political career, but those inside his country are supportive of him.
Reaction: I think this is a good move for our country to a certain extent. We don't want to be enemies with Modi if he rises to power. At the same time though we can't forget what he has been involved in. Our government shouldn't get too involved with him. All that's necessary is to prevent having another enemy in another country.
Connection: This connects to the interaction of parties in Congress. They get along because it is necessary but they look out for what is most beneficial to their party. They also don't trust each ihrer very much.
Student debt may hurt housing recovery by hampering first-time buyers- Economics- Brianna Klabunde
http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/student-debt-may-hurt-housing-recovery-by-hampering-first-time-buyers/2014/02/17/d90c7c1e-94bf-11e3-83b9-1f024193bb84_story.html
Summary: In the past year the housing market has taken a much bigger hit than usual. First time buyers who are usually the foundation of sales have been responsible for only a third of purchases. This is extremely below average. This problem seems to be attributed to the debt first time buyers are in after college. The housing market has recently become much less forgiving to those who have taken student loans. Most people after college are relying on help from their parents to even try to purchase a home after schooling.
Reaction: I don't understand why the housing market has made it increasingly difficult for people with student loans to purchase a house. This ultimately will hurt the business more than if they just offered more reasonable prices. It doesn't seem like anyone knows what to do about the issue. Frankly, I think the problem is just going to get worse.
Connection: This reminds me of when we were learning about why in state tuition can be more the out of state. Since people don't pay state income tax it doesn't count as discrimination, therefore the difference is justified. Although it seems like the expenses are absolutely ridiculous. The cost of going to college is almost enough reason not to go for some people. While in this circumstance it might be the housing markets fault for not giving those with student loans a break, some of the blame can be attributed to schooling cost in the first place. If students didn't have such high loans to pay off maybe they would have enough to purchase a house when they finally graduated.
Summary: In the past year the housing market has taken a much bigger hit than usual. First time buyers who are usually the foundation of sales have been responsible for only a third of purchases. This is extremely below average. This problem seems to be attributed to the debt first time buyers are in after college. The housing market has recently become much less forgiving to those who have taken student loans. Most people after college are relying on help from their parents to even try to purchase a home after schooling.
Reaction: I don't understand why the housing market has made it increasingly difficult for people with student loans to purchase a house. This ultimately will hurt the business more than if they just offered more reasonable prices. It doesn't seem like anyone knows what to do about the issue. Frankly, I think the problem is just going to get worse.
Connection: This reminds me of when we were learning about why in state tuition can be more the out of state. Since people don't pay state income tax it doesn't count as discrimination, therefore the difference is justified. Although it seems like the expenses are absolutely ridiculous. The cost of going to college is almost enough reason not to go for some people. While in this circumstance it might be the housing markets fault for not giving those with student loans a break, some of the blame can be attributed to schooling cost in the first place. If students didn't have such high loans to pay off maybe they would have enough to purchase a house when they finally graduated.
Monday, February 17, 2014
Sarah Flynn(economic)-State of the Union 2014: President Obama Puts Strengthening Women Front and Center
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/maria-shriver/state-of-the-union-2014-women_b_4691386.html
summary: The president put strengthening women front and center as a solution to strengthening our nation's economy. "I firmly believe when women succeed, America succeeds," the president said. but women need equal pay in order to succeed. The president says they should get rid of all the policies that prevent women from being good moms and good workers. Today, women make up nearly two thirds of minimum-wage workers -- this at a time when women also earn most of the college and advanced degrees in this country, make most of the consumer spending decisions by far, and are more than half of the nation's voters.
reaction: I think its good women are getting some credit and that the president is trying to help them. I also think he shouldn't only help the women and mothers that are in need of help he should help everyone that needs help.
connection: the equal rights amendment. I think some things need to be changed for women to have equal power and rights but I also think all people who need help should receive an equal chance to get help.
summary: The president put strengthening women front and center as a solution to strengthening our nation's economy. "I firmly believe when women succeed, America succeeds," the president said. but women need equal pay in order to succeed. The president says they should get rid of all the policies that prevent women from being good moms and good workers. Today, women make up nearly two thirds of minimum-wage workers -- this at a time when women also earn most of the college and advanced degrees in this country, make most of the consumer spending decisions by far, and are more than half of the nation's voters.
reaction: I think its good women are getting some credit and that the president is trying to help them. I also think he shouldn't only help the women and mothers that are in need of help he should help everyone that needs help.
connection: the equal rights amendment. I think some things need to be changed for women to have equal power and rights but I also think all people who need help should receive an equal chance to get help.
Olivia Solbrig Economics
http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/white-house-stimulus-bill-was-good-for-economy/2014/02/17/68e00462-9800-11e3-ae45-458927ccedb6_story.html
summary: the White House came out with a report that the Stimulus bill which cost approx 787 billion dollars has been successful in aiding the economy and they say it helped to avoid another Great Depression. The Republican Party is arguing that the bill spent too much and only got a little back. The report said that the bill will continue to have positive effects on the long run growth and that it will boost the economy, and they are saying that eventually most of it will pay for itself. Republicans have still been arguing saying that it has little effect. Obama plans to address it soon.
reaction: I cans de points of view for both sides. While there have been so,e positive outcomes, it does make sense to question whether these outcomes are worth the billions of dollars that are being put into the program. Is it worth all of that money if the program isn't achieving the things it was meant to? I am interested to see what president Obama will have to say on the topic.
Connection: this connects to the policy mandate we were talking about in class. This was something Obama started at the beginning of his presidency, and talked about while being elected. The people took this promise and expected the policy to get put into place as soon as he got into office. The peoples support most likely helped to get this bill into effect so soon.
summary: the White House came out with a report that the Stimulus bill which cost approx 787 billion dollars has been successful in aiding the economy and they say it helped to avoid another Great Depression. The Republican Party is arguing that the bill spent too much and only got a little back. The report said that the bill will continue to have positive effects on the long run growth and that it will boost the economy, and they are saying that eventually most of it will pay for itself. Republicans have still been arguing saying that it has little effect. Obama plans to address it soon.
reaction: I cans de points of view for both sides. While there have been so,e positive outcomes, it does make sense to question whether these outcomes are worth the billions of dollars that are being put into the program. Is it worth all of that money if the program isn't achieving the things it was meant to? I am interested to see what president Obama will have to say on the topic.
Connection: this connects to the policy mandate we were talking about in class. This was something Obama started at the beginning of his presidency, and talked about while being elected. The people took this promise and expected the policy to get put into place as soon as he got into office. The peoples support most likely helped to get this bill into effect so soon.
McKenna Earnest National Security "Watchdog: Security measures hurt press freedom"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/watchdog-security-measures-hurt-press-freedom/2014/02/12/4501660e-93f4-11e3-9e13-770265cf4962_story.html
Summary: The efforts that the U.S. is putting forth to keep national security private has made press freedom fall dramatically. Our country has fallen 13 spots from last year, in a recent press freedom survey. Situations, like the one with Chelsea Manning, leaker of private documents to WikiLeaks, is one instance that has made press freedom very limited. Press freedom is at a low in Syria right now, where many journalists have been killed for reporting, or trying to report, on the current Syrian war.
Reaction: I honestly can't even believe that we were higher in press freedom considering how secretive our government is. I understand why we are that way though. With all of the conflict America gets involved in, there is a reason to be quiet about our affairs with foreign countries. There are some things that cannot or should not be shared with the public, because of the nature of the content and how the public may handle it.
Connection: This connects with how all countries work to protect their citizen's or the rest of the world from knowing things they shouldn't. If there's news of a possible war threat, the government isn't going to come out and tell the public that there's a chance. The government would keep quiet until things were figured out for sure. It's also the same with countries hiding things from other governments, like the knowledge of nuclear power.
Summary: The efforts that the U.S. is putting forth to keep national security private has made press freedom fall dramatically. Our country has fallen 13 spots from last year, in a recent press freedom survey. Situations, like the one with Chelsea Manning, leaker of private documents to WikiLeaks, is one instance that has made press freedom very limited. Press freedom is at a low in Syria right now, where many journalists have been killed for reporting, or trying to report, on the current Syrian war.
Reaction: I honestly can't even believe that we were higher in press freedom considering how secretive our government is. I understand why we are that way though. With all of the conflict America gets involved in, there is a reason to be quiet about our affairs with foreign countries. There are some things that cannot or should not be shared with the public, because of the nature of the content and how the public may handle it.
Connection: This connects with how all countries work to protect their citizen's or the rest of the world from knowing things they shouldn't. If there's news of a possible war threat, the government isn't going to come out and tell the public that there's a chance. The government would keep quiet until things were figured out for sure. It's also the same with countries hiding things from other governments, like the knowledge of nuclear power.
Jenn Campbell Healthcare and Environment: Beyond the Bedside: The Changing Role of Today's Nurses
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/charles-tiffin-phd/nursing-school_b_1384285.html
Summary:
Nurses roles are becoming more and more involved in the care of patients on the health scene and the years go by. Their jobs are evolving beacuse hospitals budgets are getting tightened, therefore they are understaffed, and diseases are becoming more complicated. Now because our medical care is increasingly depending on technology nurses have to be able to work with the new technology to track the information and they need to be able to tell patients where to go for more information on the internet. Also, nurses have to be able to listen and understand people because they deliver hour-to-hour care and interact with the families of patients. The nursing field is also broadining in other fields like diabetes, obesity, pharmacology, but the main job of a nurse stays the same, "It's about being a more effective member of the health care team and navigating clinical systems
Reaction:
Being who I am opinion wise, I think it is really cool that a seemingly minor group is actually incredibly important to a major system in our nation. Without these people we would all die, just sayin. But what I find most fascinating is how much their roles are evolving. The stereotype of a nurse is so done who wiped noses but they actually know A LOT about medical science, terminology, and physiology, and their knowledge is all specific to whatever subcategory they specialize in. Power to the little people is what comes to mind when I think of nursing, but now I realize that they're not the little people anymore.
Connection:
I know this is broad, but really nursing is comparable to the government. If you think about it, nursing is a really broad field, like the government, and it has all these different subcategories that are all crucial to the general flow of the big guns. The nurses are sort of like lobbyists for interest groups because interest groups need lobbyists to capture the Congressmen or Congressswomen's interest to become more prominent in their "white noise" making.
Summary:
Nurses roles are becoming more and more involved in the care of patients on the health scene and the years go by. Their jobs are evolving beacuse hospitals budgets are getting tightened, therefore they are understaffed, and diseases are becoming more complicated. Now because our medical care is increasingly depending on technology nurses have to be able to work with the new technology to track the information and they need to be able to tell patients where to go for more information on the internet. Also, nurses have to be able to listen and understand people because they deliver hour-to-hour care and interact with the families of patients. The nursing field is also broadining in other fields like diabetes, obesity, pharmacology, but the main job of a nurse stays the same, "It's about being a more effective member of the health care team and navigating clinical systems
Reaction:
Being who I am opinion wise, I think it is really cool that a seemingly minor group is actually incredibly important to a major system in our nation. Without these people we would all die, just sayin. But what I find most fascinating is how much their roles are evolving. The stereotype of a nurse is so done who wiped noses but they actually know A LOT about medical science, terminology, and physiology, and their knowledge is all specific to whatever subcategory they specialize in. Power to the little people is what comes to mind when I think of nursing, but now I realize that they're not the little people anymore.
Connection:
I know this is broad, but really nursing is comparable to the government. If you think about it, nursing is a really broad field, like the government, and it has all these different subcategories that are all crucial to the general flow of the big guns. The nurses are sort of like lobbyists for interest groups because interest groups need lobbyists to capture the Congressmen or Congressswomen's interest to become more prominent in their "white noise" making.
Hannah Chin Health Care and Environment 2 - E.P.A. Staff Struggling to Create Pollution Rule
Link: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/05/us/epa-staff-struggling-to-create-rule-limiting-carbon-emissions.html?ref=earth
Summary: Economists and engineers at the EPA are struggling to create legislation to regulate carbon emissions produced by top coal-fired power plants. If a solution can be found, this legislation could potentially be the most significant action taken by the United States to curb climate change. However, if the regulations are too loose, little environmental impact could be made. If the legislation is too strict, coal plants may be shut down before there is enough alternative power to replace them. President Obama is giving Congress and the EPA until June 1 to create a draft of the new regulations. Not only are these changes effecting the EPA, but also other agencies such as the Natural Resources Defense Council, The American Energy Alliance, and American Electric Power. A solution needs to be found in order to protect our environment and produce energy efficiently.
Reaction: I believe that the EPA is in a very difficult position. Their legislation needs to provide a happy medium or else the change will be catostrophic. I think it is important that the EPA weighs all the possible outcomes and chooses the solution that best betters the lives of our citizens.
Connection: I think this situation with the EPA relates to how difficult it is to pass a bill through Congress. Not only must the EPA work to find a solution to the emissions created by coal-fired plants and appease the companies that support this legislation, but they also must endure the process of how a bill becomes a law. I think a lot of people underestimate the pressure that Congress is put under and how difficult it is to gain support and pass a bill.
Summary: Economists and engineers at the EPA are struggling to create legislation to regulate carbon emissions produced by top coal-fired power plants. If a solution can be found, this legislation could potentially be the most significant action taken by the United States to curb climate change. However, if the regulations are too loose, little environmental impact could be made. If the legislation is too strict, coal plants may be shut down before there is enough alternative power to replace them. President Obama is giving Congress and the EPA until June 1 to create a draft of the new regulations. Not only are these changes effecting the EPA, but also other agencies such as the Natural Resources Defense Council, The American Energy Alliance, and American Electric Power. A solution needs to be found in order to protect our environment and produce energy efficiently.
Reaction: I believe that the EPA is in a very difficult position. Their legislation needs to provide a happy medium or else the change will be catostrophic. I think it is important that the EPA weighs all the possible outcomes and chooses the solution that best betters the lives of our citizens.
Connection: I think this situation with the EPA relates to how difficult it is to pass a bill through Congress. Not only must the EPA work to find a solution to the emissions created by coal-fired plants and appease the companies that support this legislation, but they also must endure the process of how a bill becomes a law. I think a lot of people underestimate the pressure that Congress is put under and how difficult it is to gain support and pass a bill.
Christian Steffen economics-2
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/robert-samuelson-myth-making-about-economic-inequality/2014/02/02/4cda72ac-8a9a-11e3-a5bd-844629433ba3_story.html
Myth making about economic inequality
Summary: The article touches on the myths about the economic differences in America. There is in denying the fact that there is an economic gap in the U.S, and angers grow and the fire of discontentment is further fueled with the rich further profiting at what seems like the expense of the rest of the country. President Obama states that the family and economic situations for middle aged African Americans is now shared with the working class Americans as a whole. Many of those people do not have full time jobs, only about 6 percent. Other won't or can't work. The article says that the economic gap is not to blame for the recession the country is experiencing. Each class of person, low class-the very wealthy, have experienced gains in income relative to inflation. It only seems the poor are poor in comparison to the rich. Rich Americans are scapegoats because they are easy targets.
Reaction- I agree with most of the content of this article. I do not believe the wealthy are too privileged because I do believe that success should not be punished because the alternative is rewarding mediocrity. I agree that the economic gap is not to blame for our recession, it is because of Americans spending more than they have. This is affirmed in the article. President Obama is correct when he says that the situation for many Americans has worsened and shows no sign of improving. However, I do no think that this is because of the economic gap. I believe that there will always be an economic gap in a capitalist economy because that is what makes a capitalist economy capitalist.
Connections-I can connect this article with interest groups and their ways to influence the government as well as the iron triangle. The interest groups use measures to get their ideas heard from the people of Washington. They use lobbying as one way of influences the changes they want to see in policy. This is the same idea as the rich getting richer. In the iron triangle model, a system of favors insure and interest groups use former congressmen to get their policy heard and their changes enacted. Since the former government officials already know people in the government, the cycle of essential corruption continues. The same goes for the rich and their inherent ability to become even richer, since they have the money already, they are able to make it faster.
Saturday, February 15, 2014
Sydney Wientjes; Social Welfare: "Half a Century of Poverty in America"
"Half a Century of Poverty in America"
Summary: This article is a counter to the claim of those in conservative circles that "We fought a war on poverty, and poverty one." The author explains that we have not, in fact, "lost." There has been steady progress since the Depression, as exemplified by a graph shown in the article. There are constant plans being made in order to dissect the issues surround poverty and poverty itself in conferences held by multiple organizations in the next few days. The author then explain's how President Johnson's "unconditional war on poverty" steadily worked with the creation of Medicaid, Medicare, better food stamp programs, Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC), better education, improved welfare in general, and the Head Start program. After just fourteen years, the plan reduced poverty by 50%. In addition, since 1945, the poverty rate has decreased 25% since 1935.
Reaction: I believe that, no, we have not "lost" the war on poverty, but we are far from having won. I also believe that some of the more recent changes in the fight have been a little less than effective. There need to be some serious alterations to social welfare programs that seem to have been neglected. Trillions of dollars have gone into these programs and the progress is just too subtle for the hefty price tag. However, I agree with the author's standpoint that the improvement since the Depression is just a start, and there is a long way to go until poverty is eliminated in the US.
Connection: The main premise of this article can be connected to what we learned in class about "fishy" advertisements and false information put out into the media. There have been multiple attack ads stating that the war on poverty has been ineffective, even detrimental, to the US. The information in this article counters these claims with factual evidence refuting those claims. All in all, this article demonstrates the necessity for Americans following the media and election ads to be careful and check the facts before siding with one party or another.
Summary: This article is a counter to the claim of those in conservative circles that "We fought a war on poverty, and poverty one." The author explains that we have not, in fact, "lost." There has been steady progress since the Depression, as exemplified by a graph shown in the article. There are constant plans being made in order to dissect the issues surround poverty and poverty itself in conferences held by multiple organizations in the next few days. The author then explain's how President Johnson's "unconditional war on poverty" steadily worked with the creation of Medicaid, Medicare, better food stamp programs, Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC), better education, improved welfare in general, and the Head Start program. After just fourteen years, the plan reduced poverty by 50%. In addition, since 1945, the poverty rate has decreased 25% since 1935.
Reaction: I believe that, no, we have not "lost" the war on poverty, but we are far from having won. I also believe that some of the more recent changes in the fight have been a little less than effective. There need to be some serious alterations to social welfare programs that seem to have been neglected. Trillions of dollars have gone into these programs and the progress is just too subtle for the hefty price tag. However, I agree with the author's standpoint that the improvement since the Depression is just a start, and there is a long way to go until poverty is eliminated in the US.
Connection: The main premise of this article can be connected to what we learned in class about "fishy" advertisements and false information put out into the media. There have been multiple attack ads stating that the war on poverty has been ineffective, even detrimental, to the US. The information in this article counters these claims with factual evidence refuting those claims. All in all, this article demonstrates the necessity for Americans following the media and election ads to be careful and check the facts before siding with one party or another.
Tuesday, February 11, 2014
Matt Van Horn- Social Welfare- "Immigration reform- Path of least resistance"
http://www.economist.com/news/united-states/21595974-republicans-may-be-groping-their-way-compromise-path-least-resistance?zid=309&ah=80dcf288b8561b012f603b9fd9577f0e
Summary- The focus of the article is on the problem of immigration reform. This has been a major problem in congress over the last few years. No one can seem to come to an ideal compromise, to many different views and ways of thinking on this topic have made it a difficult one to solve. Republicans have noticed the increasing Latino vote and our starting to change their policies. There has been discussion on allowing the already born babies from illegal immigrants to be granted citizenship automatically. Also there has been talk of allowing undocumented workers to apply for citizenship after paying back taxes, taking an English proficiency test, and passing a back ground check. These ideas are just in the works and our being openly debated by both parties in congress.
Reaction- I think congress needs to come to a good compromise on this issue. Illegal immigration is a huge problem that needs to be solved. I believe a system needs to be implemented to allow the illegal immigrants that have already set up lives and their families here to become American citizens. It would add more tax money to the faltering economy and we need every cent possible. I also believe the border protection needs to be re invented to stop future illegals from coming in and taking advantage of the policies being discussed. All in all this is definitely a topic that needs to be solved.
Connection- You can make the connection with how the Illegal immigrants are trying to join a government to protect their rights and values just like John Locke said in his excerpts from Of civil Government. John Locke says no one should be forced under a political power without his own consent, and these people were born into a situation without there own consent and the only way to a better situation was to migrate illegally. Without doing it illegally it could have taken years out of their lives which they can not afford, our government should help ease there pains and make most illegals that have been settled down for a while so their own rights can be protected as citizens in a country and government they want to be in. A place that they want to set up their lives and make their home as patriotic citizens.
Summary- The focus of the article is on the problem of immigration reform. This has been a major problem in congress over the last few years. No one can seem to come to an ideal compromise, to many different views and ways of thinking on this topic have made it a difficult one to solve. Republicans have noticed the increasing Latino vote and our starting to change their policies. There has been discussion on allowing the already born babies from illegal immigrants to be granted citizenship automatically. Also there has been talk of allowing undocumented workers to apply for citizenship after paying back taxes, taking an English proficiency test, and passing a back ground check. These ideas are just in the works and our being openly debated by both parties in congress.
Reaction- I think congress needs to come to a good compromise on this issue. Illegal immigration is a huge problem that needs to be solved. I believe a system needs to be implemented to allow the illegal immigrants that have already set up lives and their families here to become American citizens. It would add more tax money to the faltering economy and we need every cent possible. I also believe the border protection needs to be re invented to stop future illegals from coming in and taking advantage of the policies being discussed. All in all this is definitely a topic that needs to be solved.
Connection- You can make the connection with how the Illegal immigrants are trying to join a government to protect their rights and values just like John Locke said in his excerpts from Of civil Government. John Locke says no one should be forced under a political power without his own consent, and these people were born into a situation without there own consent and the only way to a better situation was to migrate illegally. Without doing it illegally it could have taken years out of their lives which they can not afford, our government should help ease there pains and make most illegals that have been settled down for a while so their own rights can be protected as citizens in a country and government they want to be in. A place that they want to set up their lives and make their home as patriotic citizens.
Brianna Klabunde- economics- Pay Jobless Workers to Relocate
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/11/american-worker-mobility-act_n_4767989.html?utm_hp_ref=economy
Summary: the American Worker Mobility Act presents a new solution to lower unemployment in our country. According to this act, the government would no longer be giving away money to the unemployed and hoping they find jobs. Instead, the act would provide money to people willing to relocate. Usually moving to a place where a job is available is simply too expensive for someone who is unemployed. This solution is meant to make it more likely for someone to find a job.
Reaction: I believe this is a very innovative idea. Someone seems to actually be thinking out of the box and focusing on the sources of unemployment. Although I don't think this act will completely eliminate the severity of unemployment, it is definitely a start.
Connection: This act was created by a democrat and a republican who is a member of the tea party interest group. I believe this is a classic example of the power interest groups have a linkage institution. They are clearly making differences and provided ideas that might not have otherwise been presented.
Summary: the American Worker Mobility Act presents a new solution to lower unemployment in our country. According to this act, the government would no longer be giving away money to the unemployed and hoping they find jobs. Instead, the act would provide money to people willing to relocate. Usually moving to a place where a job is available is simply too expensive for someone who is unemployed. This solution is meant to make it more likely for someone to find a job.
Reaction: I believe this is a very innovative idea. Someone seems to actually be thinking out of the box and focusing on the sources of unemployment. Although I don't think this act will completely eliminate the severity of unemployment, it is definitely a start.
Connection: This act was created by a democrat and a republican who is a member of the tea party interest group. I believe this is a classic example of the power interest groups have a linkage institution. They are clearly making differences and provided ideas that might not have otherwise been presented.
Fawcett - National Security - Iran’s Rouhani Blocks Missile Test, Fights Hard-Liners
Time : Iran’s Rouhani Blocks Missile Test, Fights Hard-Liners
Summary - The recently-elected President of Iran, Hassan Rouhani, has been stepping down Iran's nuclear program despite protest from more conservative officials. Shuttering a missile test by blocking funding, Rouhani has attempted to ease diplomatic stress and loosen costly economic sanctions, but he treads a fine line domestically between being too soft or too hard.
Reaction - I believe Rouhani is showing some sense here. Stepping down both uranium enrichment and rocketry research help ease international tension and assuage fears of an imbalance of power. Because sanctions are inversely related to threat, Rouhani's policies put Iran on a tentative road to repairing strained relations between themselves, their neighbors, and faraway powers.
Connection - Although the article was about internal Iranian affairs, it can still be connected. Rouhani's actions have brought into focus how sanctions achieve their effects, and just how the USA protects their interests in the tumultuous Middle East.
Austin Dreher - Adm. McRaven: Expect special forces ‘Iron Man’ suits by 2018
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/feb/11/adm-mcraven-expect-special-forces-iron-man-suits-2/
Summary - Admiral McRaven of SOCOM (the Special Operations Command) has established TALOS, a program that plans on funding research for suits that are similar to "Iron Man" suits.
Reaction - I find this concept to be a bit ridiculous. I understand how these suits could be useful, but if you weight the costs and benefits, the idea seems to be a bit too expensive for the outcome. now obviously the suits wouldn't be able to fly and all of that crazy stuff; they would only be for protection. However, the thought of how much time, money, and effort that will go into making these suits is rather high.
Connection - Adm. McRaven's promise to have these suits completed by the year 2018 could relate to a candidate's policy agenda for their election
Summary - Admiral McRaven of SOCOM (the Special Operations Command) has established TALOS, a program that plans on funding research for suits that are similar to "Iron Man" suits.
Reaction - I find this concept to be a bit ridiculous. I understand how these suits could be useful, but if you weight the costs and benefits, the idea seems to be a bit too expensive for the outcome. now obviously the suits wouldn't be able to fly and all of that crazy stuff; they would only be for protection. However, the thought of how much time, money, and effort that will go into making these suits is rather high.
Connection - Adm. McRaven's promise to have these suits completed by the year 2018 could relate to a candidate's policy agenda for their election
David Niska- National Security Policymaking: Foreign Aid
Summary: The United States of America is unique in many ways but in one way, is that it donates more total aid than any other country. Most Americans believe that foreign aid only helps a few people and does not do any good for the nation as a hole. One reason that the U.S. uses foreign is for strategic locations like: Israel, Egypt, Turkey, and Greece. Most of the percentage of foreign aid that we supply is in the form of military assistance but we also use: agricultural modernization, irrigation, and population control. One program that has been important for foreign aid is the Food for Peace program; this program not only helps in foreign aid but also gives farmers in the U.S. an economic boost. Another group called the Peace Corps has volunteers that go out to different countries to provide medical care. The biggest thing to know is that most of the aid is from grants that cane from private voluntary organizations.
Reaction: I think that foreign aid is a good thing but can turn into a bad thing quickly. If you supply a country with foreign aid for to long, that country can become dependent on you. Foreign aid does establish friendships with other countries, so if your country is under attack, the country that you provided aid to will help you in times of trouble. The main thing that I like about it is that it's not one sided.
Connection: My connection to this goes back to the 10 Amendment. It says "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. Since their is nothing in the Constitution that deals with foreign aid, then the people have the power to vote on foreign aid to either keep it going or to stop it.
Reaction: I think that foreign aid is a good thing but can turn into a bad thing quickly. If you supply a country with foreign aid for to long, that country can become dependent on you. Foreign aid does establish friendships with other countries, so if your country is under attack, the country that you provided aid to will help you in times of trouble. The main thing that I like about it is that it's not one sided.
Connection: My connection to this goes back to the 10 Amendment. It says "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. Since their is nothing in the Constitution that deals with foreign aid, then the people have the power to vote on foreign aid to either keep it going or to stop it.
Delays for Employers in Health Law, Carter Brown, Health Care 1
Further Delays for Employers in Health Law
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/11/us/politics/health-insurance-enforcement-delayed-again-for-some-employers.html?ref=us
Summary:
The government keeps pushing back deadlines that are making business of 50 or more people get health care for their employees. Now these companies don't have to start following the law until 2016. This has gotten mixed reviews because all the republicans are now saying that Obama keeps making exemptions for his own law and that shows that its a failure. But the business' don't mind cause it will be hard for some to provide that type of health care for all their employees.
Reaction:
I like the idea that Obama is giving small business' more time to come up with the money to afford all the health care, however I don't like that he keeps pushing off his own law. Doing this makes it seem like he is second guessing himself and makes the law seem less absolute. Soon we will all be exempt from it and it will have been a big issue for nothing. So in the long run he needs to stick with one law or else he is going to lose a lot of support.
Connection:
This is like the hydraulic theory because the law got made, then it got chopped down some to almost where it was before. Obama made a big change to the health care policy, but already the hydraulic theory has taken place and all the things it changed are slowly going back, most likely through court cases.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/11/us/politics/health-insurance-enforcement-delayed-again-for-some-employers.html?ref=us
Summary:
The government keeps pushing back deadlines that are making business of 50 or more people get health care for their employees. Now these companies don't have to start following the law until 2016. This has gotten mixed reviews because all the republicans are now saying that Obama keeps making exemptions for his own law and that shows that its a failure. But the business' don't mind cause it will be hard for some to provide that type of health care for all their employees.
Reaction:
I like the idea that Obama is giving small business' more time to come up with the money to afford all the health care, however I don't like that he keeps pushing off his own law. Doing this makes it seem like he is second guessing himself and makes the law seem less absolute. Soon we will all be exempt from it and it will have been a big issue for nothing. So in the long run he needs to stick with one law or else he is going to lose a lot of support.
Connection:
This is like the hydraulic theory because the law got made, then it got chopped down some to almost where it was before. Obama made a big change to the health care policy, but already the hydraulic theory has taken place and all the things it changed are slowly going back, most likely through court cases.
Blake Bodenschatz; Is the Affordable Care act affordable for all?
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/01/14/stateline-obama-health-care/4471957/
Summary: Financial industries state that for much of the lower class that have to pay for housing, electricity, food, child care, already have enough to pay for. Even just $50- $100 more can be a real burden on many people. According to Janet Varon, executive director of the Northwest Health Law Advocates "some people simply won't be able to manage to pay their health insurance premiums consistently with all the other costs facing them". The ACA allows states to create separate insurance plans for people that can't afford Medicare even with financial help.
Reaction: It does not surprise me that many people can't afford this health care act that are under the poverty line. Since these people have many other items to pay for in order to create a healthy life for their families and themselves. Even though health care is important there are many other items that people need to survive than having to pay $50 or $100 just for all their Medicare.
Connection: President Clinton tried to create a similar health care plan back in 1993. This plan is similar to the health care of today by providing it for anyone that can not afford health care normally! it would have made the health care cheaper so more people could afford it. Clinton's health care act did not pass though, but many of his ideas are in this health care act, like making it affordable for anyone who needs health care.
Summary: Financial industries state that for much of the lower class that have to pay for housing, electricity, food, child care, already have enough to pay for. Even just $50- $100 more can be a real burden on many people. According to Janet Varon, executive director of the Northwest Health Law Advocates "some people simply won't be able to manage to pay their health insurance premiums consistently with all the other costs facing them". The ACA allows states to create separate insurance plans for people that can't afford Medicare even with financial help.
Reaction: It does not surprise me that many people can't afford this health care act that are under the poverty line. Since these people have many other items to pay for in order to create a healthy life for their families and themselves. Even though health care is important there are many other items that people need to survive than having to pay $50 or $100 just for all their Medicare.
Connection: President Clinton tried to create a similar health care plan back in 1993. This plan is similar to the health care of today by providing it for anyone that can not afford health care normally! it would have made the health care cheaper so more people could afford it. Clinton's health care act did not pass though, but many of his ideas are in this health care act, like making it affordable for anyone who needs health care.
Jason Erbst- National Security- "U.S. weighs lethal strike against American citizen"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/us-weighs-lethal-strike-against-american-citizen/2014/02/10/24bc47ac-9268-11e3-b46a-5a3d0d2130da_story.html
Summary: there is an alleged American citizen believed to be an affiliate of al-Qaeda who has been planning strikes against the United States. He has been tracked but this information of even his name is being released because of fear that he will go deeper into hiding. They are planning a drone strike on him to take him out. But the controversy comes when the question is asked if it is constitutional to kill an American citizen without due process through the courts. This is one of Obamas most controversial topics that has risen while in office.
Reaction: I have heard of this before and still don't know what to think about it the second time round even. You could look at it from this perspective; if one man dies to possibly save others more significant to that one who dies, then it is in best interest of the people that the person gets taken out. National security outweighs the life of one person. In my mind.
Connection: I try and connect this to the policy making system. People are trying to get this case which isn't even a case through the courts to get due process for this guy. Obama did pass policy to where strikes can go outside of the combat zone. But for this to happen, the strike has to be on something that has immediate threat to Americas national security. And will more than likely result in 0 civilian casualties. He has gone through the ropes to get to this point, and yet people still challenge it.
Summary: there is an alleged American citizen believed to be an affiliate of al-Qaeda who has been planning strikes against the United States. He has been tracked but this information of even his name is being released because of fear that he will go deeper into hiding. They are planning a drone strike on him to take him out. But the controversy comes when the question is asked if it is constitutional to kill an American citizen without due process through the courts. This is one of Obamas most controversial topics that has risen while in office.
Reaction: I have heard of this before and still don't know what to think about it the second time round even. You could look at it from this perspective; if one man dies to possibly save others more significant to that one who dies, then it is in best interest of the people that the person gets taken out. National security outweighs the life of one person. In my mind.
Connection: I try and connect this to the policy making system. People are trying to get this case which isn't even a case through the courts to get due process for this guy. Obama did pass policy to where strikes can go outside of the combat zone. But for this to happen, the strike has to be on something that has immediate threat to Americas national security. And will more than likely result in 0 civilian casualties. He has gone through the ropes to get to this point, and yet people still challenge it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)